Claiming he has not been served, Mark Driscoll filed a motion to dismiss the racketeering lawsuit against him and former Mars Hill executive pastor Sutton Turner brought by former members of Mars Hill Church in Seattle. Two couples from the church allege misuse of funds.
Like Turner’s motion to dismiss, Driscoll appeals to rules of procedure requiring service of a lawsuit in 90 days. The essential claim of the motion is that the Jacobsens and Kildeas have abandoned the suit.
Driscoll claims his whereabouts are well known.
After Turner filed his motion, I asked attorney Brian Fahling for a comment with no reply.
Driscoll plans to launch his new church The Trinity Church in Scottsdale on August 7.
Category: Warren Throckmorton
Eric Metaxas Doubles Down on Claim That Donald Trump is Our Only Hope
In an interview about his new book with John Zmirak for the online publication, The Stream, Eric Metaxas doubled down on his support for Donald Trump. After much talk implying that evangelical Christianity is the only foundation for virtue, he claims Trump is “our only hope.”
John: This current election is deeply dissatisfying to many Christian voters. How would you answer those who see Hillary Clinton as a grave threat, but fear that Trump lacks the virtue (much less the religion) to lead a free people? Even if he’s the lesser of two evils, is his rise a symptom of our fading virtue and faith?
Eric: Yes, Donald Trump’s rise is certainly a symptom of our fading virtue and faith, but ironically he may well be our only hope for finding our way back to bolder expressions of them. The eerie waxworks automaton formerly known as Hillary Rodham Clinton will no doubt double down on President Obama’s two-term repulsion to Constitutional government, in which unutterably sad case we simply wouldn’t ever be able to claw our way back up the abyss into which we shall have been thrust. If two more anti-Constitutionalist judges are shoehorned onto the Supreme Court we will have a Constitutional crisis — actually a cataclysm — in which the last Justices of that hoary institution will take that thing once described by a Constitutionalist Executive as the “government of the people, by the people, for the people” and place it into a coffin gaily decorated with smiley face and rainbow stickers.
It is uncanny to me that Metaxas puts his trust in one man and a deeply flawed man at that.
I say again that his book is pointless if at the end of the day Trump is our best hope.* In fact, based on his reasoning for supporting Trump, he really doesn’t believe in the value of virtue and faith. He fully trusts in a conservative majority on the Supreme Court. If we can get that, then all is well. If we can’t, then who cares about a virtuous people, the cataclysm cometh.
In response to Metaxas’ Trump endorsement, some folks expressed disbelief and disappointment on Twitter.
Eric Metaxas endorsed Trump so can we stop pretending that he understands Bonhoeffer at all?
— Dwight Davis (@tdwightdavis) June 15, 2016
I'm surprised and disappointed that @ericmetaxas endorsed Trump. WWBD (What Would Bonhoeffer Do?) https://t.co/ICs5vMo04i
— Brian G. Hedges (@brianghedges) June 18, 2016
Is racism the foible? Or would that be more of a peccadillo? No no, the hate mongering must be the peccadillo.https://t.co/QYJMrB9gYz
— Eddie Kaufholz (@EdwardorEddie) June 17, 2016
So @ericmetaxas says we need virtuous leadership & therefore "must vote Trump." My response: LOL https://t.co/2Mx05sFCWj
— Tyler Braun (@tylerbraun) June 17, 2016
Eric Metaxas Explained https://t.co/YtVSkUGXNf via @drejwest
— Jim West (@drjewest) June 17, 2016
Putting his lack of wisdom on display for all to see, @EricMetaxas says, "we must vote for Trump." https://t.co/ElxWrujXyB #NoisyCymbal
— Nick Laparra (@NickLaparra) June 17, 2016
author who extols virtue says vote for virtuelessness… https://t.co/vRG3KT6hPc
— Andrew T. Walker (@andrewtwalk) June 17, 2016
Terribly disappointed @ericmetaxas if Trump truly is "our last best hope" we've already losthttps://t.co/rGWmHIamiW#NeverHillaryNeverTrump
— Kamilla Ludwig ن (@TheBraveLass) June 17, 2016
"@ericmetaxas needs to withdraw his book because there is absolutely nothing in it we need." https://t.co/FHkyrPwdH2
— Zachary Moore (@drzach) June 18, 2016
@ericmetaxas should re-read-read his Bonhoeffer book before supporting @realDonaldTrump: National Review #gutless https://t.co/urLEz4z3vC
— Jay Madden (@jmadden67) June 17, 2016
https://t.co/We1TFbdjBz pic.twitter.com/QOsqtLAOeQ
— O. Alan Noble (@TheAlanNoble) June 17, 2016
@TheAlanNoble @ericmetaxas Are racism, misogyny, and a complete disregard for the law foibles, peccadilloes, or metaphorical warts?
— (((BrendtWWaters))) (@bwsqrd) June 17, 2016
One of the saddest casualties of the Trump campaign is my respect for Eric Metaxas…
— Andrew Blalock (@AndrewDBlalock) June 17, 2016
@wthrockmorton smh
— Russell Moore (@drmoore) June 17, 2016
*If You Can Keep It is also plagued by historical errors which I pointed out here, here and here.
Eric Metaxas: We Need Virtue in Our Leaders and We Must Vote for Donald Trump
Thanks to Kathryn Jean Lopez at National Review for asking Eric Metaxas how he reconciles his call for public virtue with his support for Donald Trump. It still doesn’t make sense to me but at least the contradiction is exposed and obvious.
I addressed Metaxas’ alarmism in a post earlier today. In today’s NR post, Lopez asked Metaxas if leaders need to display virtue. Metaxas said “generally, yes.” Then Lopez brings the money to the table:
KJL: Does that automatically suggest one cannot vote for one Donald J. Trump?
METAXAS: Not only can we vote for Trump, we must vote for Trump, because with all of his foibles, peccadilloes, and metaphorical warts, he is nonetheless the last best hope of keeping America from sliding into oblivion, the tank, the abyss, the dustbin of history, if you will. If you want to know how bad things are in America, and how far we have gone, read the previous sentence aloud over and over.
Donald Trump is our “last best hope?!” He will keep us from the abyss? These sentences don’t tell me how bad things are in America but they do indicate the seriousness of Metaxas’ apocalyptic fever.
If the answer to America’s problems is in his new book, where in his book does he recommend anti-virtue? He argues against himself. He says we are at the abyss and to fix this, we must recapture faith which leads to virtue which leads to freedom. However, he then argues Republicans should acquiesce to Donald Trump’s nomination which brings us someone who:
- praises Putin and thinks a friendly meeting with Kim Jong-un is a good idea
- advocates torture for combatants and death to civilian families
- declares a judge to be unfair because of his heritage
- wants to deport 11 million people
- limits the freedom of the press
- singles out an entire religion for discrimination
- rationalizes Trump University, other business misadventures too numerous to mention, and his obvious lack of preparation to be president
In the interview, Metaxas claims that Hillary is so bad that the nation will not survive her. To me, this shows a stunning lack of historical perspective. Hillary is not blameless by any means but there is no comparison which places Trump in the category of America’s last best hope.
If Trump is America’s last best hope, then Metaxas needs to withdraw his book because there is absolutely nothing in it we need.
Instead, we need GOP delegates to have a Bonhoeffer moment at the convention. They are not bound to vote for the worst choice. I recently saw Thomas Jefferson quoted in a Weekly Standard article on this very point. In 1810, Jefferson answered a question posed by John Colvin about deviating from observance of the law:
A strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to the written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means.
Sure, it would be a long shot to contest the primary results, but it would not be impossible. In this case, doesn’t virtue demand it? Trump is not now the nominee. What would Bonhoeffer do? Give up? Give in?
Eric Metaxas: Things in America Are as Bad as During the Revolution and the Civil War
Promoting his new book, If You Can Keep It, Eric Metaxas told National Review’s Kathryn Jean Lopez that things are pretty bad right now.
America is in an existential crisis no less serious than the one we faced in the Civil War. Or the crisis before that, when our nation came into being in the Revolution. For the first time in a century and a half we are facing the imminent vanquishing of the republic, except there is no John Bull or Johnny Reb to fight against. We are being hollowed out silently from within by termites — and a hollow, brightly painted shell called “America” will soon exist where America once stood.
Can he really mean that?
There is strong disagreement among citizens about issues like abortion, gay marriage and gun control, but war has not broken out. Even with the harsh political season, we are hardly at the point of civil war.
I went to church last Sunday. I plan to go again this Sunday. No government thugs came anywhere close to my house of worship. I have exercised the same freedoms this week in my small town that I have all my life. All over the nation, lots of people exercised their freedom to do things I disapprove of but those actions did not stop me from doing what I believe to be right.
I don’t think things are as good as they could be. I think extremism on the left and right is a problem and the polarization of the society has increased. I believe the far left and far right should be held responsible for this. I could go on about this.
Currently, I worry that the GOP nominee Metaxas plans to vote for — Donald Trump — is eroding civility and virtue. I worry that his candidacy is a cancer on the GOP and political process. If anything, Metaxas is complaining about how bad things are but he supports a person who is helping to lead us there.
I think reminders to live virtuously are valuable. Human nature being what it is, I believe we need to be reminded of our values so his appeal to us to live virtuously is fine as far as it goes. However, Metaxas’ pitch is eroded by doomsday fear mongering, the historical errors in the book. and his advocacy for a presidential candidate that simply can’t be emulated in the manner he advocates in his book.
Sutton Turner Files Motion to Dismiss RICO Lawsuit Against Him and Mark Driscoll
Yesterday, Sutton Turner filed a motion to dismiss the RICO lawsuit naming Mark Driscoll and him as defendants. He said he was never served and asked the court to dismiss the suit.
I. RELIEF REQUESTED
Defendant John Sutton Turner requests an order dismissing all of Plaintiffs’ claims against him for failure to effectuate service of process on him within the 90-day period prescribed under FRCP 4(m). Plaintiffs filed their complaint on February 29, 2016, and to date, have failed to serve Mr. Turner, nor have they made any diligent efforts to do so. Their claims against Mr. Turner should be dismissed.
Today, Turner published a blog post explaining his side of the matter. He concludes by saying:
There has been significant media coverage on this lawsuit, causing irreparable harm to my reputation and business career. I am only sharing this in order to get my side of the story out there, and hope that it is helpful for anyone still seeking answers about Mars Hill Church and the false accusation levied against me.
I have reached out to the attorney for the Jacobsens and Kildeas and hope to have a comment to add shortly.