Bryan Fischer: Ban everything

He’s getting harder and harder to spoof, but here goes…

AFA analyst calls for ban on everything

Tupelo, MS – Writing today for the website RenewMerica, Bryan Fischer asserted that all sex everywhere needs to be curtailed.

“Just one wrong move and you’re done for,” Fischer wrote. “It’s like cigarettes and gay sex, we are all one smoke or one hook up away from disaster.”

Fischer was reacting to a government report suggesting that one cigarette can be the one that kills you. “Of course, I naturally and initially thought of gay sex. Because gay sex spreads HIV, the first fab time could be your last.”

Extrapolating his thinking, Fischer noted that in Uganda heterosexual sex is the main driver of the spread of HIV/AIDS. This fact demands an aggressive strategy.

“Since one act of straight sex can kill you, the government should crack down on the practice,” Fischer advised. “There simply is no level of safe exposure to straight sex.”

Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are not mine and don’t represent the views of anyone, even myself, or this blog. Even though the opinions expressed are written on this blog, they do not necessarily represent the views of the blog owner.  Actually they just magically appeared here and stuff.

16 thoughts on “Bryan Fischer: Ban everything”

  2. Reminds one of that saying ‘a drink before and a cigarette after are the best three things in life’ … to which I would reply: ‘I do not take a drink before going to Mass’!!!

  5. Reminds one of that saying ‘a drink before and a cigarette after are the best three things in life’ … to which I would reply: ‘I do not take a drink before going to Mass’!!!

  11. All human activity involves risk. The essential flaw in his thinking on gay sex is ‘situational’. Consider a gay couple, both of whom are HIV-negative, and who are faithful to each other: the risk of either contracting HIV infection is zero. It is also the case that gay people (both ‘positive’ and ‘negative’) who are not in stable relationships can take measures to radically reduce the risk to themselves and others.

    The most effective long-term solution to the control of the spread of HIV involves self-respect, respect for others, honesty and integrity. This applies to both gay people and straight people. For example (as Warren suggests): in Uganda, unfaithful married persons are at higher risk than responsible gay persons.

    Fischer is intent on undermining the self-respect of gay people, and promoting others’ disrespect towards them. He is therefore an ‘HIV risk factor’!

  12. I do wonder how Fischer would respond to this post…probably by calling you a “radical homosexualist” or some such nonsense.

    Of course, when wondering how the government can warn people about the dangers of smoking without warning about the dangers of unsafe sex, Fischer conveniently ignores the prevalence of such warnings. Of course, these warnings don’t say what he wants them to say; rather than arbitrarily condemning a class of people, the warnings focus on sex practices that actully are dangerous — such as unprotected sex, sex with multiple partners and sex while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.

    Someone really should point out to Fisher that 1) condoms are tremendously effective at preventing the transmission of STDs, including HIV/AIDS, as long as they are used correctly every time, and 2) two men in a monogamous relationship who are both HIV negative will not spontaneously develop HIV just because Fischer disapproves of their relationship.

    Of course, many have already pointed it out to him, but he appears to be immune to inconveniences like facts and the truth in his crusade to straighten out America…

  13. Warren,

    You have not made the connection between sex and smoking….afterglow.

  15. All human activity involves risk. The essential flaw in his thinking on gay sex is ‘situational’. Consider a gay couple, both of whom are HIV-negative, and who are faithful to each other: the risk of either contracting HIV infection is zero. It is also the case that gay people (both ‘positive’ and ‘negative’) who are not in stable relationships can take measures to radically reduce the risk to themselves and others.

    The most effective long-term solution to the control of the spread of HIV involves self-respect, respect for others, honesty and integrity. This applies to both gay people and straight people. For example (as Warren suggests): in Uganda, unfaithful married persons are at higher risk than responsible gay persons.

    Fischer is intent on undermining the self-respect of gay people, and promoting others’ disrespect towards them. He is therefore an ‘HIV risk factor’!

  16. I do wonder how Fischer would respond to this post…probably by calling you a “radical homosexualist” or some such nonsense.

    Of course, when wondering how the government can warn people about the dangers of smoking without warning about the dangers of unsafe sex, Fischer conveniently ignores the prevalence of such warnings. Of course, these warnings don’t say what he wants them to say; rather than arbitrarily condemning a class of people, the warnings focus on sex practices that actully are dangerous — such as unprotected sex, sex with multiple partners and sex while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.

    Someone really should point out to Fisher that 1) condoms are tremendously effective at preventing the transmission of STDs, including HIV/AIDS, as long as they are used correctly every time, and 2) two men in a monogamous relationship who are both HIV negative will not spontaneously develop HIV just because Fischer disapproves of their relationship.

    Of course, many have already pointed it out to him, but he appears to be immune to inconveniences like facts and the truth in his crusade to straighten out America…

Comments are closed.