In the last week or so, I have been reading many emails and comments from men who felt positive and negative about their New Warrors Training Adventure and Integration Group experiences. Via some searching I found a manual for the I-groups from 2005 that describes a variety of techniques for leading I-groups. Some of these sound very much like therapeutic techniques I read about in the 1980s designed to help clients uncovering repressed memories and perhaps some therapists still conduct. One such technique is referred to as “bucketing” in the I-group manual. In my opinion, this technique is of questionable efficacy in the hands of experienced therapists, let alone lay people.
MKP-International PIT 5.2 Facilitator Manual
The purpose of this process is:
To follow an emotional charge to an earlier source
Release the charge
Gain insight to the behaviors around the charge
To discover a shadow, own it, and own its projection onto others
Develop new action (reaction) choices
- To continue to peel the onion
1. Identify an emotional charge or judgment regarding another man who is present in the circle or an emotional charge about a person not present.
2. Have two men face each other (sitting or standing) with a facilitator at their side.
3. If it’s about someone from outside the circle have the man with the issue identify who his brother (seated across from him) is role playing.
4. The facilitator instructs the man who is the object of the emotional charge or judgment to sit in silence, listen attentively, and maintain eye contact
(The Facilitator can read from this form until he masters the process over time)
Data: “And so _____, tell this man the Data or facts around this issue.”
Judgment: “Tell this man the Judgments you have around this Data.”
Feeling: “Tell this man the Feeling you have from this Judgment.”
Locate in body: “Close your eyes. Where in your body do you feel that feeling?”
Shape, Size, Color: “If that feeling were an object, what shape would it be? What size is it? What color?”
Voice: “Now give it a voice. What words is it saying? Say it again – louder this time.”
Regression: “Now let this voice take you back. Follow your body back to an earlier time when you felt that way. Go back in time, maybe back to the first time you felt feeling. Let your body take you back, let this voice take you back, back in time.”
Wound: “What’s happening? Who’s there? How old are you? What’s happening?”
REPEAT: “And then what happens…?” Until the trauma is complete.
Shadow: “What are the messages you are getting right now? What decisions are you making? What beliefs and judgments are you taking on? What behaviors / reactions are you learning and adopting from this?”
Return: “Slowly begin to come forward in time again, forward, forward until you find yourself back in this place and time, back in this room with these men. When you’re ready and fully back in this time and place, open your eyes.”
Lesson: “What did you learn about your charge around this issue?”
Projection: “What about you were you projecting onto this man?”
Ownership: Do you choose to own that shadow? Do you see that any issue around which you have a charge or upset is an opportunity to learn about yourself?”
Healing: “Now go back in time to just before this experience. Turn back the clock and bring your adult self into the picture. Would you like to go back through this experience with his help this time? Ask him to help you. O.K… Turn the clock forward and see what happens this time. What’s happening? Repeat “and then what happens” until the man is complete.”
Empowerment: “What messages are you getting now? “What decisions are you making? What new behavior choices do you have available now? That’s great. Now become your adult self.”
Self-Forgiveness: “How do you feel about this 2-year old that had to go through this experience alone?
Can you forgive him for the decisions he made and the behaviors he adopted?” Can you release any judgments you made about him? Have the adult man take his own little boy into his heart. Can you forgive yourself for holding this unconscious belief & behavior? Can you forgive yourself for continually re-creating this drama in your life, hoping that someday it would turn out better?” Can you let go of your negative self-judgments?”
Forgiveness: “Can you now begin to forgive ________ (whatever person involved in triggering this issue for the man, IE, Bad Dad) for playing out his/her immature pattern?”
“Are there any judgments of (him/her) that you need to release?”
Return: “Slowly return to this room. How do you feel? Is there anything else you need to complete this?”
NOTE: If this is an inside issue, or a conflict resolution, continue below. Otherwise, stop here.
More…: “Do you still have an issue with this man? If yes, tell the man what you own around the issue, and what you want for yourself.”
Perception Checking: Have the other man repeat back what he heard. Have him say how he feels, what he owns around this issue, and what he wants for himself.
Conflict Resolution: Keep working the above steps with each man until the process comes to a resolution where both men have been heard, and both men get what they want.
Choices: “Based on what you learned in this process, how else could you have reacted to this issue? What choices could you now make in the future?”Close: “Do you need anything else around this? Is this complete for now?”
The wording here is a little vague, but this process describes a facilitator helping a participants frame negative experiences as possibly emanating from past trauma. However, using visualization in order to suggest someone can regress to an earlier age can promote false recollections of trauma. Furthermore, this description certainly seems like therapy to me in that the process seems designed to enable trauma recovery. In Part 2 regarding “bucketing,” I will post one former Warriors experience of bucketing that did not go as nicely as described in the manual.
One thought on “Mankind Project technique – “Bucketing,” Part One”
Looks about right…I agree that this has limited benefit in the hands of a therapist. Useful in uncovering reactivity to someone else due to projection. Hardly scientific (the facilitators stuff could get in the middle of the process) also screening the participant for likelihood of suggestability or negative regression does not occur.
Most therapists are trained to withhold their biases from the therapuetic process as well as asses clients for their ability to engage in various therapeutic processes without adverse reactions.
Hard to give informed consent as a participant in MKP weekend…you can give consent, but not informed consent since you don’t know the risks.
Comments are closed.