Another Ron Paul endorser cites the death penalty for homosexuality

Today on Ron Paul’s website, an article by pastor Voddie Baucham is touted on the front page. The article titled, “Baptist Pastor Explains ‘Why Ron Paul?,'” provides reasons why Rev. Baucham believes Ron Paul should be elected. Clearly, the Paul campaign believes this is an important endorsement (as they did the endorsement of Phil Kayser).

Baucham is often cited on theonomy websites (e.g., American Vision and Theonomy Resources). Baucham is a proponent of removing all children from the public schools and an opponent of having age based youth groups.

In a 2009 blog post, Baucham wrote critically of President Obama’s June, 2009 proclamation of LGBT Pride Month, saying:

Hence, sodomites, who who are in large part responsible for the introduction and spread of the HIV/AIDS epidemic are praised for responding to this plague in an attempt to avoid annihilation (by the way, I know you don’t have to engage in sodomy to get HIV, but that doesn’t change the facts… see  the book, And the Band Played On for an honest look at this issue).  This is revisionism at its worst.

The President goes on to celebrate the fact that this abomination (Lev 18:22) worthy of the death penalty (Lev 20:13) is now being celebrated in the open.  He writes,  “Due in no small part to the determination and dedication of the LGBT rights movement, more LGBT Americans are living their lives openly today than ever before.” This is a clear sign of the devolution of culture.  As Paul writes in Romans, “Though they know God’s decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.” (Rom 1:32 ESV)

Although Baucham writes “this abomination (Lev 18:22) worthy of the death penalty” and follows it with his view of Romans 1, he does not directly call for the death penalty now.  However, he does believe that the authority of civil government comes from God and that the church should inform civil leaders of biblical law. Baucham, like many Reconstructionists, believes that Ron Paul has a biblical view of jurisdiction. In his statement, Baucham says that Paul supports state’s rights and believes in limiting Federal power.

Additional information: In this sermon, Baucham refers again to the Leviticus and Romans passages which he interprets as calls for the death penalty. At the same time, he says gays should not be bashed. The inconsistency is not addressed.

Related:

 

6 thoughts on “Another Ron Paul endorser cites the death penalty for homosexuality”

  1. General ideas like anarchy, freedom or self-government – how impractical they may be – tend to have a divisive effect on the population. The underdogs feel that they have more to win than to lose, and like them. The upper dogs feel that they have more to lose than to win, and dislike them.

    So even if gays might have voted for Ron Paul in the 1950s or 1960s, they won’t do it nowadays, at least not en masse. And you needn’t convince them about that, they just feel it.

  2. General ideas like anarchy, freedom or self-government – how impractical they may be – tend to have a divisive effect on the population. The underdogs feel that they have more to win than to lose, and like them. The upper dogs feel that they have more to lose than to win, and dislike them.

    So even if gays might have voted for Ron Paul in the 1950s or 1960s, they won’t do it nowadays, at least not en masse. And you needn’t convince them about that, they just feel it.

  3. Of course, Baucham cites Leviticus (a Book parts of which he probably completely ignores whenever it suits him), effectively misrepresents the Sodom & Gomorrah story (with his ‘sodomite’ rhetoric) and conveniently (for him) forgets bits of Romans 1 and pretty much all of Romans 2.

    But there we are … I’m sure none of that bothers a nasty little nutcase like him!

  4. Of course, Baucham cites Leviticus (a Book parts of which he probably completely ignores whenever it suits him), effectively misrepresents the Sodom & Gomorrah story (with his ‘sodomite’ rhetoric) and conveniently (for him) forgets bits of Romans 1 and pretty much all of Romans 2.

    But there we are … I’m sure none of that bothers a nasty little nutcase like him!

Comments are closed.