You were done before you started. Your misinformation, dissembling and evasions were never going to work here.

However, your posts are a good example of the type of person who would blindly follow Driscoll.

Yes, from one side of the story. I’m done here.

You have never told us who Driscoll is accountable to at the church.

Not “speak the truth”, hide the truth.

As far as “speaking to what you know” if that were true you would be able to provide simple straight forward answers to questions you have been asked. You refuse, which says a great deal about your interest in “the truth.”

You didn’t intend to, but you have just admitted your demands for “the whole story” are nothing more than a attempt to prevent discussion about Driscolls reprehensible behaviour. You demand something you know people can’t provide as a way of avoiding addressing the evidence they can provide.

it isn’t a “smear” to provide facts (which you keep ignoring). Warren, and Juilie Roys (and others) provide actual evidence of their claims, Evidence your childish tactics aren’t going to hide.

Unsubstantiated claims and a refusal to provide any relevant detail never will. You made claims of “threats to the church” but won’t say what these “threats” actually were. Nor will you even say if these “threats” are from Manuele (which you imply but don’t actually say).

You keep demanding “the whole story” but refuse to provide any real information yourself.

Nothing will satisfy you. I trust my source, without knowing or sharing every intricate detail. This is your lives, and I have much better things to do.

An atmosphere of disrespect I see. A troll because I try to speak truth since I attend there. I don’t claim to know everything but speak to what I do know. Why does the Professor allow this?

I didn’t ask if you were there. I asked what is it you don’t know? and why don’t you know “the whole story?”

Someone mentioned the Manueles. I have talked to someone who saw texts of threats to the church.