Yes, and true indeed.

I always have responded with respect and treated people with dignity, even though that is rarely afforded to me.

Now that’s rich.

Haven’t I been clear? The problem is bigger than Trump. The threat to our democracy is not four years of Trump or eight years. It is a losing party who is trying to pull off a coup d’etat because they lost at the ballot box. You are okay with that apparently . I am not because next time it will be used against someone else. Where does it stop?

This is not sideline crap. It is the real issue. Trump will be gone one day. But what will be left? Political parties with no boundaries? Is that really what you want?

My purpose is to tell the truth. I don’t care which way it cuts. I think Trump is a bad president who got elected by a divided GOP primary (remember, most Republicans voted against Trump until he was the only one left) and a bad Democratic candidate.

Everything I said is documented. But rather than respond to that, you attack me. I welcome a response to facts and arguments. I always have responded with respect and treated people with dignity, even though that is rarely afforded to me. The problem is that you won’t respond to the issue. As usual, you just want to attack me. I suspect this is because you can’t. You know what I said is true.

Most of the time I don’t respond to you because you contribute nothing but personal attacks to a conversation. Even this time, I started not to respond. But I did.

So if you don’t want me to respond, then don’t respond to me. But as I have for over twenty years, when someone responds to me, I give them the dignity of a response back to them. Your choice.

To the question, if you think I am defending the president’s actions, you can’t read.

So you are offering all this sideline crap, what, because you agree that he should be impeached? As I said, your only purpose is to muddy the water. Please don’t respond on my account, I’m kinda done wasting time on this one.

There was more than “information about foreigners.” There were foreigners paid to get dirt, and information was solicited from foreigners for the purpose of affecting the outcome of the 2016 election. It seems to foreign interference only mattered if it was Trump. I disagree. I think it matters no matter who it was.

I haven’t seen evidence that it was the Russian government, though it is interesting how much people have backed off that claim after trumpeting it about for several years.