What is your evidence that Johnson sought to “bring blacks into the plantation of government dependence’?

Further, the Civil Rights act of 1964 was passed by a democratic controlled senate and a democratic controlled house and signed by a democratic president. So your claim that “the dems unilaterally rejected it” is false.

While it is correct there were many democrats opposed to the Civil rights act, mostly those were the ones who switched to the republican party.

your insults don’t hide the fact that you provide no proof of the claims you make. Nor do they hide the counter-evidence that your claims are wrong.

if you wish to be taken seriously here you will need to provide actual evidence. Not unsupported claims and false statements.

However, after this last post, I suspect you really aren’t interested in being taken seriously.

Claiming something doesn’t make it true. I’m asking you for the specific quotes that Johnson said (or wrote) that you believe supports that claim.

Nor is it true that “the dems rejected it”. The majority of democrats in congress voted for the civil rights act. Lex lata has provided the actual vote counts, while you have given nothing but spurious claims I know to be factually incorrect.

if you have any evidence to support your claims, provide it, If not, stop making them.

As I said an hour ago, which you ignored in the desperate attempt to ask the same question hoping for a different answer:

his own actions, and comments that he would have them so vowed that they would be voting democrat for 200 years,

The dems rejected it, and it was passed by unilateral Republican support. That a communist president used it to further his control does not change your side rejects it to this day.

One wonders that if your party “switches” every time you make mistakes. How many “party switches” will you claim in 30 years that is taking place today?

I say none as your party will not be around then.