A college psychology professor's observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues
Commenter Evan recently posted a link to a informative powerpoint produced by colleague Morten Frisch regarding his study of social and family factors associated with homosexual and heterosexual marriage in Denmark. Morten is no stranger to this blog as he commented at length regarding the Cameron’s biased attempt to estimate homosexual lifespans. I reviewed this … Continue reading “Frisch & Hviid and reparative drive theory revisited”
I talked about it here and yesterday, ReutersHealth published an article about Frisch’s gay mortality study. With a sure to be provocative title, the article summarizes the main findings. I have been surprised that only bloggers – and few of them – have picked up on this research. There is a little something here for … Continue reading “ReutersHealth covers Frisch gay mortality study”
Just after I posted my evaluation of Drs. Cameron’s gay life expectancy report, I received the following email from Morten Frisch which is a reply to Kirk Cameron’s letter in rebuttal to Dr. Frisch. Dear Dr. Throckmorton, As sadly anticipated, Drs. Paul and Kirk Cameron were not objective when writing their report ’Federal Distortion of … Continue reading “Only the gay die young? Part 5 – Morten Frisch responds to Kirk Cameron”
In an email received Friday, Paul Cameron’s son, Kirk, responded to the post here on this blog from Danish epidemiologist Morten Frisch. It is a 4 page response in a Word document which is why I will link to it instead of reproduce it in this post. Thanks to Dr. Cameron for permission to post. … Continue reading “Only the gay die young? Part 3 – Kirk Cameron responds to Morten Frisch”
In March, the Christian Post reported on the Cameron & Cameron study of gay life expectancy. Today, the CP reported the criticisms of this report by Morten Frisch first published here on this blog. I appreciate this balanced reporting.