FWIW, the South Africans I know
(a) are not of one race – there are multiple races represented in South Africa, just like everywhere else; and
(b) take great care to explain that the variant was first identified in South Africa because they had the technology to isolate it, but the variant is known as B1351.
So, maybe the people who are labeled – whether maliciously or not – don’t like it, and that other people think they shouldn’t mind is not relevant.

Charges of Marxism are being made from the alt-right as a way of discrediting them, i.e. doing to them exactly what BLM says is happening.</blockquote.

It's the same shtick you found in the old John Birch Society:
Denouncing everyone else as "COMMUNISTS! COMMUNISTS! COMMUNISTS! THEY'RE HERE! THEY'RE THERE! THEY'RE EVERYWHERE! THE COMMUNISTS! THE COMMUNISTS! THE COMMUNISTS!"

Again you misrepresent BLM. While certainly there are likely some members who believe racial injustice is “the fault of every white person in America” that is not the official stance of the entire movement.

what they argue is that the entire system is racist, in some cases intentionally (ex. laws that target minorities). in other cases it is just a by-product of the fact that whites are in the majority and a mix of other reasons as well.

That a founder has Marxist ideas does not mean the organization is Marxist. They could be vegan as well but it still doesn’t necessarily make the organization so. As Americans we have to own a huge piece of the blame for institutional racism in this country, the same way we collectively take pride in some of the good things we represent. Until we do that, we can’t fix it. There is nothing new about this concept, therefore denying it could be construed negatively, yes.

That a founder has Marxist ideas does not mean the organization is Marxist. They could be vegan as well but it still doesn’t necessarily make the organization so. As Americans we have to own a huge piece of the blame for institutional racism in this country, the same way we collectively take pride in some of the good things we represent. Until we do that, we can’t fix it. There is nothing new about this concept, therefore denying it could be construed negatively, yes.

“The biased slaughter of African Americans is just one aspect of this movement.”

No, not “just one aspect”, the most important aspect of the movement. You have taken lessor arguments by BLM and elevated them to being equivalent to their primary reason to exist: eliminating racial injustice. In doing so, you falsely imply the the entire movement supports “revolution” when they do not.

The article that you provided tells that BLM co-founders identified as Marxists. However, it is not exclusively Marxist movement and I never said that. My problem is that this movement, just like CRT, is saying that all those cases, and there are many of them, where injustices done by whites to people of color, is supposedly the fault of every white person in America, instead of those particular individuals. I don’t agree with that and I have a problem that there is a trend in our society, even among Democratic politicians to label me and others for this disagreement as being either racist or racially insensitive.

It cannot be denied with any cediability that African Americans, as a group, have been (and continue to be) descriminated against (oppressed) by a mostly white contingent of society. I don’t know why recognizing this would mean the individual is not valued or considered. This sounds like just so much babble.

There may be a marxist or socialist in BLM, but the group’s mission is as I described it. Charges of Marxism are being made from the alt-right as a way of discrediting them, i.e. doing to them exactly what BLM says is happening. Slavery is just one facet of America’s Original Sin, and it continues today in your own words and those others like you.

https://www.tampabay.com/news/nation-world/2020/07/22/politifact-is-black-lives-matter-a-marxist-movement/

It cannot be denied with any cediability that African Americans, as a group, have been (and continue to be) descriminated against (oppressed) by a mostly white contingent of society. I don’t know why recognizing this would mean the individual is not valued or considered. This sounds like just so much babble.

There may be a marxist or socialist in BLM, but the group’s mission is as I described it. Charges of Marxism are being made from the alt-right as a way of discrediting them, i.e. doing to them exactly what BLM says is happening. Slavery is just one facet of America’s Original Sin, and it continues today in your own words and those others like you.

https://www.tampabay.com/news/nation-world/2020/07/22/politifact-is-black-lives-matter-a-marxist-movement/

The biased slaughter of African Americans is just one aspect of this movement. It further calls attention to the entire American society where, according to them, people are not seen as individuals but rather as part of collective groups, oppressed vs. oppressors, in this case, African Americans v. Whites. Most importantly, this movement explains such an inequity in the US because of the existence of capitalism, and calls for an entire remaking and reshaping of an American society, a revolution.