So your just another troll coming to waste time on a Christian blog? I have better things to do with my time. I am called to speak to my own people. Thank God for the ability this platform gives you to block trolls. I have already done that for some others here who have wasted way too much of my time in the past. Goodbye, I will not see anything else you post here. Thank God!

This isn’t a “christian blog”. Never has been (although I suppose its time on Patheos might give that impression).

Or “boy, I miss smallpox.”

“Again, you care nothing at all about what is right from God’s perspective.”

that is correct. Nor do I care about your particular religious beliefs either.

Again, you care nothing at all about what is right from God’s perspective. You talk like a lawyer trying to see how much you can get away with from a legal perspective. I do not care what the human perspective is with all its excuses. What is the righteous thing to do from God’s? You come across like some jerk lawyer…

“What you are suggesting is stupid beyond stupid.”

No it is actually part of existing CDC/medical guidelines for how to inform employee’s of potential exposure (emphasis added):

If an employee is confirmed to have COVID-19 infection, employers should inform fellow employees of their possible exposure to COVID-19 in the workplace but maintain confidentiality as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The fellow employees should then self-monitor for symptoms (i.e., fever, cough, or shortness of breath).

Further, Roys was NOT attempting to inform people of potential exposure, instead she was violating medical confidentiality by posting the names for the world to see.

That wasn’t the case here. The staff at the church were already informed about the risk of exposure, BEFORE Roys made their names public.

IF the information about potential exposure needed to go beyond that staff it could have been done without naming the people who were infected.

yes, the facebook page is also inappropriate and possibly prompted by Roys’ emails. However, just because someone else also inappropriately posted the name doesn’t mean she should do the same thing.

As for the videographer, are you aware if Roys actually knows the name?

I’d be inclined to agree, except that in reading the story it appears that the church had already publicized these names before the blog was posted, for example by posting on the church Facebook page asking for prayer for this pastor’s healing (one would hope the church cleared that with the sick pastor).
I notice that Julie R. did not name the non-pastor videographer who was also infected.

What you are suggesting is stupid beyond stupid. Who cares about laws when love demands that leaders walk in the light? You are arguing for darkness. Your viewpoint is pure evil when looking at it from Orthopraxy. Jesus orders us to walk in the light and not cover up things in darkness. Everyone exposed recently to the sick pastor and his family should know. The congregation should also know that their head pastor is a megalomaniac narcissist who only cares about being in the limelight. That white-washed septic tank is no pastor. He is a victimizer headed straight to hell. Those around him are actively participating in high crimes in heaven. All glory should be going to God, and not to a schmuck who has been hired to grandstand in a pulpit.