Parents should be responsible. But part of their responsibility must be to recognize that public health is important for their, and each others’, children.

Freedom of conscience is very important, but so is social responsibility.

Bald-faced lies.

“Freedom of conscience,” whatever that means in this instance, does not override the public health. This is especially true when those objecting do not accept basic scientific fact.

All this nonsense started with a conman’s fake study and has snowballed via internet fueled conspiratorial claptrap. It is not “the state” it is the general public. Providing for the general welfare is an important aspect of governments, Federal and Municipal.

It is not hyperbole to say that those who are pushing this anti-vaccination ideology have very real blood on their hands. This is not the place to push your agenda.

Reproducible results lead to consensus. Your sources are fiction, not science.

Nonsense. Deal in facts or stop commenting.

Your sources are beyond bad.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/harvard-study-unvaccinated-children/

Don’t forget about that $2000 “Ion Detox” machine to treat autism. They promote that as well. This is a farce, and a dangerous one at that.

Actually you are mistaken (thank God). most people still value freedom of conscience and view PARENTS as those responsible for their kids, NOT THE STATE.

Like the right of the children killed in the production of vaccines?

Or like the right of the children killed by vaccines yearly? See VAERS.

Absolutely not. Where there is risk there must always be choice.

And the unvaccinated pose NO additional threat to anyone.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Harvard-Immunologist-to-Legislators-Unvaccinated-Children-Pose-ZERO-Risk-to-Anyone.pdf

Two responses:
https://samanthanaturally.com/2019/07/01/vaccination-a-biblical-and-scientific-perspective/

http://eowyns-heir.blogspot.com/2019/07/reasons-why-christian-might-object-to.html