Wow. looks like Eastman is trying to litigate all the election fraud claims. Likely he’s trying to use the “if you can’t dazzle them with dexterity, then baffle them with bullshit” approach.

It would be great if that backfired on him and the court decides to examine those claims, but most likely the judge will ignore all that arguing it has no merit in deciding the issue of privilege.

Ken, the documentary is called 2000 Mules and I was bumfoozled upon seeing it used as an authoritative source in the ongoing, high-profile legal case between John Eastman (Trump lawyer) and the House of Reps January 6 Committee (the one where the district judge noted in a March ruling that Eastman and Trump “more likely than not” engaged in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election).

Eastman filed his reply brief last Friday, 5/19, and in it he refers to 2000 Mules as further proof of election fraud based on its “exhaustive analysis of geospatial cell phone data and drop box video surveillance”.

The brief can be found here and 2000 Miles is found on page 6 near the top.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840.345.0.pdf

Both of those articles are well worth reading, even though my eyebrows got lost in my hairline. Since 71% of Republicans mostly or fully believe that Joe Biden was not legitimately elected, it’s profitable for D’Souza to push his ‘geolocation data’ on the already gullible.

And that he “solved a murder” with his “analysis”. Except indictments were made 2 months earlier.

10 is not 0 as D’Souza claimed. Kruse et. al. only needed to find 1 to prove D’Souza wrong. he found 10, in a matter of minutes. Further, Kruse provided the records showing they were slave holders AND republicans.

While you (and D’Souza) have provided NO evidence of your claims.