Again, if you followed Warren’s past posts on this, you know it isn’t simply a matter of “false belief”. Many have pointed out how what they have said is false (and presented the evidence of it) and yet they keep repeating those falsehoods. I.e. they are lying.

Knowingly calling an organization by a wrong name is bearing false witness, whether it be “Democrat Party” or “Republic Party” (or I have seen Publican Party suggested).
Not a huge deal, but bearing false witness is never “nothing”.

Being as that it is a party of Democrat, just like the Republican Party is a party of Republicans, calling it the Democrat Party is not really bearing false witness. It might be a bit of a tweak, but I think it became popular when Bush did it unintentionally (remember how bad he was with words at times). There were uses before Bush, but it seems more common now.

But the reality is that there are real issues to be discussed. This is nothing compared to those real issues like whether or not a living baby outside the womb should be cared for and protected. Getting upset over a name is small potatoes beside that.

My comment was not directed at Warren, who quickly acknowledged and corrected his careless mistake. If only people like Barton and D’Souza behaved so honorably.
It was in reply to another commenter who called criticism of the use of that epithet “much ado about nothing”.

My comment was not directed at Warren, who quickly acknowledged and corrected his careless mistake. If only people like Barton and D’Souza behaved so honorably.
It was in reply to another commenter who called criticism of the use of that epithet “much ado about nothing”.