No all you have done is given vague generalities, set up false equivalences “both sides do the exact same thing”, and present extreme examples as though they were commonplace. Without giving any specifics it is hard to take any of your claims seriously. Esp. since the one example you did give turned out to be incomplete and left out a significant piece of information.

It’s not new that the concept of evangelicals has been associated with the Republican Party. I’m sure you remember Moral Majority movement from the 1980s! I am not so sure that Ralph Drollinger and Capital Ministry, about whom this article is written, are necessary Republican lobbyists let alone Trump supporters, though. They come across as those who want to evangelize as many politicians as possible without really endorsing any particular political party.

Agreed, of course, but I am just pointing out that when these evangelicals do so, they incur the label of “not REALLY a Christian” by the “evangelical leaders” who have provided blanket unquestioning support, and whom always seem to be the people who are featured on and quoted in mass media when they want to obtain an “evangelical perspective.” So, for many non-evangelicals in this country, “evangelical” has become virtually synonymous with “GOP stalwart completely sold out to Trump.” It has come to primarily mean a political identifier, not a particular theological orientation.

I’m finished answering questions you pose in this discussion, because it’s busywork. I already answered both of those questions plainly in previous comments. Thanks for engaging… I honestly do not think we disagree about much in the bigger picture. Enjoy your Sunday!