lol, that’s your best counter point; my comments seem unnecessarily partisan? lol, OK, That’s because you see party loyalty first rather than ethics/morals, however you may put it.

Bill Hybels associated himself firmly in democratic circles. He was Bill Clinton’s spiritual adviser for 8 years. He scoffed at republicans or conservatives.

A couple problems with your equivocation of political parties come to mind.
One party had they leader, Bill Clinton’s name on over 22 flight logs on the Lolita Express with convicted Pedo Jeffrey Epstein with trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets. That would be after Clinton’s GLS appearance in 2000.
One party had their leader, Bill Clinton, evade consequences for rape, sexual assault/ harassment charges (Juanita Broaddrick) and was kept in leadership power.

It wasn’t a counterpoint, it was an observation. There is nothing particularly substantive in your comments to refute.

I did not mention President Trump, so I will have to decline you H card for insufficient resources. It was interesting that you played it in the unique conditional sense, if I am a Trump supporter, so good virtue signalling to your Antifa friends. Did you have another card you wanted to use?

(trigger warning: do not read if easily triggered)
The implying and condemning of Trump Support reminded me of how other Democrat supporters impugned their special needs teen kidnap victim (F Trump this, F Trump that) and tortured him for 6 hours in Chicago after the 2016 election. I don’t think the teen was into political candidates or voted, incidentally.
(/trigger warning)

Bonus: It was Democrats that voted to keep God’s name out of their platform in their 2012 convention. So there is a kind of difference between parties there if that is a moral problem for you.

Bill seemed to be attempting a rehabilitation effort for Clinton, inviting him to the GLS to cleanse his democrat party candidates of low morals. Look Christians, he’s a bible follower and repenting.

Your comment seems unnecessarily partisan considering neither party has been free of members with personal moral failings of this type. Your use of the disparaging epithet “democrat party” (the correct name is the Democratic Party, democrat is a noun, not an adjective) is a stark tell concerning the bias you hold.

Case in point, your quote above could just as easily be used to describe the nonsense evangelical leaders spouted about Trump before he was elected (baby Christian?). They continue to fawn over him in great numbers – talk about embracing evil. Bill Hybels’ misdeeds stand on their own and do not need to be connected to partisan political conjecture.

“Bill, did your mentoring meetings with Clinton occur right after Monica’s meetings?. Did you meet her? How did Clinton explain the ongoing adultery to you while simultaneously holding bible studies with you?” Did Clinton seem sincere about following Jesus? Did you suspect he was using you to shield himself from Evangelical scrutiny? Did you ever meet any of the other women Clinton had groomed and subsequently slandered? What did you make of all those stories of untimely deaths of women and protectors of Clinton”

Many at Willow felt assaulted when they heard, after the fact, that Clinton was given the Willow Creek platform at the 2000 GLS, after vetoing the ban on partial birth abortion, the most horrific violation of innocence humanity has devised.

Bill seemed to be attempting a rehabilitation effort for Clinton, inviting him to the GLS to cleanse his democrat party candidates of low morals. Look Christians, he’s a bible follower and repenting.
Bill had given a pass to all sorts of evil the democrats embrace and continue to. No surprise he took after one of their top leaders.