Comments on: Rick Joyner Doubles Down On Prediction That America Is Headed For Martial Law

By: Scotty G.

Scotty G. — Wed, 30 May 2018 17:22:31 +0000

“As Joyner sees it, no election is going to fix America’s problems because the system is broken. He believes our only hope is a military takeover—martial law.”
Again, if there is no other option, than how can you NOT advocate for it?

By: SharonB

SharonB — Wed, 30 May 2018 17:22:31 +0000

Yes, a Jesus-putsch!
When prayer alone is not enough!

By: Scotty G.

Scotty G. — Wed, 30 May 2018 17:22:31 +0000

“I believe there are noble leaders in our military that love the republic and love everything we stand for—and they could seize the government,” he said. “I am not advocating this. I am just telling you what could happen. They could seize it and help restore the foundations, help restore the Constitution.”
If this was being presented to any other audience, it could be considered a threat.
“I’m not stating it should happen but rest assure it ‘could'”.
Moreover, this statement makes little sense for someone who is ‘not advocating’ for martial law. The only explanation for this convoluted statement is that he is trying to give himself an out if it blows up in his face.
“I believe there are noble leaders in our military that love the republic and love everything we stand for—and they could seize the government,” – a positive statement that ‘good leaders’ could do a violent act and accomplish a good thing
“I am not advocating this.” -a negative statement that suggests such an act would be wrong but not followed with an alternative action
“They could seize it and help restore the foundations, help restore the Constitution.” -Second positive statement that a violent act would accomplish a desired thing.
This is not unlike a child afraid to ask a host for a snack he sees.
“It would be nice if you gave me one of those cookies. I’m not asking you to give me one or saying that you should. But you COULD be nice and give me one.”

By: Scotty G.

Scotty G. — Wed, 30 May 2018 17:22:30 +0000

Ken, I believe your missing my point.
I’m suggesting that Joyner’s statement that he is not advocating for martial law is duplicitous at best.
IF he truly believes that democracy has failed, and…
IF he truly believes that the ONLY way to restore it is through martial law, then…
How can he NOT advocate for it?
You don’t have to convince me its wrong.

By: Sgt. Jeffery Humphrey (Honorab

Sgt. Jeffery Humphrey (Honorab — Wed, 30 May 2018 17:22:30 +0000

I leave you with this:
I, Jeffery Humphrey, do solemnly swear to support and defend the constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic.
I have left the rest off cause it is the clausal statment for assumption of command. I am no longer active or reserve so I no longer have a command structure. But that first part every real American who has taken it knows what it means and knows it can never be purged from their psyche. We lived by it, we fought for it, and we will die by it. So that this nation will NEVER perish from the earth.