<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Institute on the Constitution: Post-Civil War Amendments Helped Undo The Bill Of Rights	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/09/05/institute-on-the-constitution-post-civil-war-amendments-undo-the-bill-of-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/09/05/institute-on-the-constitution-post-civil-war-amendments-undo-the-bill-of-rights/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: alkali		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/09/05/institute-on-the-constitution-post-civil-war-amendments-undo-the-bill-of-rights/#comment-57431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alkali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=15204#comment-57431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#039; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery -- and I think that&#039;s a plausible reading -- they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#039;s an entirely salutary development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#8217; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery &#8212; and I think that&#8217;s a plausible reading &#8212; they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#8217;s an entirely salutary development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: alkali		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/09/05/institute-on-the-constitution-post-civil-war-amendments-undo-the-bill-of-rights/#comment-57432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alkali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=15204#comment-57432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#039; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery -- and I think that&#039;s a plausible reading -- they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#039;s an entirely salutary development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#8217; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery &#8212; and I think that&#8217;s a plausible reading &#8212; they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#8217;s an entirely salutary development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: alkali		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/09/05/institute-on-the-constitution-post-civil-war-amendments-undo-the-bill-of-rights/#comment-72813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alkali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=15204#comment-72813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#039; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery -- and I think that&#039;s a plausible reading -- they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#039;s an entirely salutary development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#8217; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery &#8212; and I think that&#8217;s a plausible reading &#8212; they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#8217;s an entirely salutary development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: alkali		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/09/05/institute-on-the-constitution-post-civil-war-amendments-undo-the-bill-of-rights/#comment-81218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alkali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=15204#comment-81218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#039; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery -- and I think that&#039;s a plausible reading -- they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#039;s an entirely salutary development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could reasonably argue that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments were substantially undercut by the Reconstruction Amendments.  For example, to the extent that the Ninth and Tenth Amendments could be read to protect individual rights to own slaves and states&#8217; power to enforce the legal institutions associated with slavery &#8212; and I think that&#8217;s a plausible reading &#8212; they no longer did so after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed.  Of course, I think that&#8217;s an entirely salutary development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
