Well, ‘frisky’ means ‘playful’, ‘high-spirited’, etc, but it can have – especially on this side of the Atlantic – mildly sexual connotations. I gather that the etymology of both ‘frisk’ and ‘frisky’ (reckoned to be the same) is uncertain.
I took your comment as an amusing piece of satire that also ‘made a point’.

Wow, eight whole people.
And these meetings are hilarious. A basement full of flags and empty seats. For somebody to discriminate against you, first you’d have to tell them who the hell you are.

There are things about today’s zeitgeist I don’t like, but I see no point in trying to replace what we have today with old forms of the new misery.
The Confederacy couldn’t hack it 150 years ago (when things like racial prejudice appeared somewhat more ‘credible’ to folk than they do now); what on earth makes anyone thing that something like it might succeed today? Not a chance!

From what I know of League principles, they’re less concerned with domestic issues (like marriage) and more concerned with separating the South (as a national entity) from the rest of the U.S.
If the League ever succeeds in their seceding – the general spirit in the organization is to allow issues like marriage to be handled on the state level, as was originally the case before the War Between the States.
I’ve heard the same sort of opinion about inflammatory issues like abortion. If North Carolina wants abortions and Virginia doesn’t, the onus is on the citizens of each state to pass their respective laws.
Personally – I’ve done a lot of thinking on the issue of mixed race marriages and how they ought to be dealt with; as a Christian, I see it as a matter of covenant headship, where the wife is leaving one people group for another. But my personal views do not represent the League of the South.

One can get a job wherever one wishes, as long as whatever garbage happens to be floating around inside one’s head is not allowed adversely to affect others’ legitimate rights.