I’m curious, Warren. Are you suggesting that the gun rights movement and the white supremacy movement are linked? Or are you suggesting that the confluence of these two makes for a volatile situation? I certainly agree with the latter, and suspect there might be some truth to the former.

Indeed. Ideas like “we have a ‘right’ to indulge our prejudices against … [how long have you got?!]”** always cause harm of some kind.
** And this is what these people really want: the ‘right’ to exercise their ‘prejudicial desires’, and they are extremely annoyed that the Federal Government and/or Federal Congress and/or Supreme Court says that they can’t do this with impunity. They are also immoderately angry that the duly-elected President is not white … and let’s be honest: whatever his failings may be, he has gone out of his way (too far, some would argue – possibly with some justification) not to alienate or offend white Americans.

So Tom, we should just ignore everything else they say and do, right?
Pretty much, WT, except to have a chuckle, like the weirdo on the street preaching to the parking meter. That’s my point. They just want attention. Much more like Confederate Civil War re-enactors than NightRiding KKK terrorist fulkheads I’d shoot on sight.
Just talkin’ sh spit. Remember the New Black Panthers who actually stood in front of a polling place, talkin’ spit? The ones AG Eric Holder refused to prosecute?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case
That sucked, but even that was chickenspit too—although they should have got at least a year just for “send a message” symbolism alone.
League of the South doesn’t even move the reality meter.

Q: What is the LS position regarding blacks in the South?
A: The LS disavows a spirit of malice and extends an offer of good will and cooperation to Southern blacks in areas where we can work together as Christians to make life better for all people in the South. We affirm that, while historically the interests of Southern blacks and whites have been in part antagonistic, true Constitutional government would provide protection to all law-abiding citizens — not just to government-sponsored victim groups.

What pussies. Some racists. Sounds more like the Kiwanis Club. Or the Rainbow Coalition. ;-P

Q: What is the Rainbow Coalition position regarding whites in the South?
A: The Rainbow Coalition disavows a spirit of malice and extends an offer of good will and cooperation to Southern whites in areas where we can work together as Christians to make life better for all people in the South. We affirm that, while historically the interests of Southern blacks and whites have been in part antagonistic, true Constitutional government would provide protection to all law-abiding citizens — not just to government-sponsored victim groups.

Cool! Sign me up, Brother Jesse.
…

“[The “Tea Party” is the same group we faced in the South with those white crackers and the dogs and the police,” he said. “They didn’t care about how they looked. It was just fierce indifference to human life that caused America to say enough is enough. ‘I don’t want to see it and I am not a part of it.’ What the hell! If you have to bomb little kids and send dogs out against human beings, give me a break.”

Ooops. How did that get in here? That last part was from US Congressman Charles B. Rangel [D-NY], that piece of spit.
C’mon, WT. It’s not just these puny League of the South bozos setting us at each others’ throats. Charlie Rangel is a member of the government, the US Congress. Let’s clear the decks of all of ’em. This spit has got to end.

I agree, I don’t see any chance of a 2nd civil war. However, will people get hurt if this movement comes to its stated conclusion? Yes, I believe that is possible. Check out this scene: http://www.salon.com/2013/08/01/americas_scariest_police_chief_supended/

Love it!
Or as ma ole pa use to say: “all wind and no trousers.”