<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Paul-Cruz 2016 &#8211; Have the Kingmakers Decided?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/paul-cruz-2016-have-the-kingmakers-decided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/paul-cruz-2016-have-the-kingmakers-decided/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sharon		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/paul-cruz-2016-have-the-kingmakers-decided/#comment-86502</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14519#comment-86502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Warren, I think Lynn David is asking why you brought Lane up -- his name doesn&#039;t appear in the invitation/schedule you posted, as far as I can tell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren, I think Lynn David is asking why you brought Lane up &#8212; his name doesn&#8217;t appear in the invitation/schedule you posted, as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn David		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/paul-cruz-2016-have-the-kingmakers-decided/#comment-86503</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14519#comment-86503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the NY Times called David Lane a &quot;stealth weapon&quot; of the religious right.
Warren, I know Lane has been associated with &quot;restoration/renewel&quot; projects and Huckabee, Barton, Wildmon and the AFA; but where is he mentioned before your reference to the missing AFA article?   Am I blind and miss it?  Or did he stealthily sneak in?
I&#039;ve been getting a lot of mailings from Rand Paul of late.  I think it&#039;s because I am an NRA member.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the NY Times called David Lane a &#8220;stealth weapon&#8221; of the religious right.<br />
Warren, I know Lane has been associated with &#8220;restoration/renewel&#8221; projects and Huckabee, Barton, Wildmon and the AFA; but where is he mentioned before your reference to the missing AFA article?   Am I blind and miss it?  Or did he stealthily sneak in?<br />
I&#8217;ve been getting a lot of mailings from Rand Paul of late.  I think it&#8217;s because I am an NRA member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/paul-cruz-2016-have-the-kingmakers-decided/#comment-86504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14519#comment-86504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ah, I see. The Iowa Renewal Project is David Lane&#039;s project. I see that I just assumed the reader would know that. I will fix it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see. The Iowa Renewal Project is David Lane&#8217;s project. I see that I just assumed the reader would know that. I will fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/paul-cruz-2016-have-the-kingmakers-decided/#comment-86508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14519#comment-86508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see what (if anything) Paul and Cruz have to say about Barton.  Smart money says they will be noncommittal about him.
I find it amusing how the program lists Barton as a &quot;historian&quot; though :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see what (if anything) Paul and Cruz have to say about Barton.  Smart money says they will be noncommittal about him.<br />
I find it amusing how the program lists Barton as a &#8220;historian&#8221; though 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrocles		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/paul-cruz-2016-have-the-kingmakers-decided/#comment-56219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14519#comment-56219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Libertarians would do a poor job, if they supported nobody like fellow libertarians. Their natural task is to support all kinds of cognitive/emotive minorities against the mainstream.
In this case, the point is that members of the Christian minority have, as persons,  just the  same general right to &quot;impose&quot; their ideas on public institutions as everyone else. You may be a Christian, but that doesn&#039;t justify the majority to deny you that general right.
(One might argue, from an anabaptist stand, that Christian persons should prefer living separate from the seculars. But that&#039;s not a question of general ethics  - libertarianism has to do with general ethics - neither is it the view of the evangelical left.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libertarians would do a poor job, if they supported nobody like fellow libertarians. Their natural task is to support all kinds of cognitive/emotive minorities against the mainstream.<br />
In this case, the point is that members of the Christian minority have, as persons,  just the  same general right to &#8220;impose&#8221; their ideas on public institutions as everyone else. You may be a Christian, but that doesn&#8217;t justify the majority to deny you that general right.<br />
(One might argue, from an anabaptist stand, that Christian persons should prefer living separate from the seculars. But that&#8217;s not a question of general ethics  &#8211; libertarianism has to do with general ethics &#8211; neither is it the view of the evangelical left.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
