<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fort Worth Star-Telegram on the Barton-Starbucks Fuss	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/fort-worth-star-telegram-on-the-barton-starbucks-fuss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/fort-worth-star-telegram-on-the-barton-starbucks-fuss/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrocles		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/fort-worth-star-telegram-on-the-barton-starbucks-fuss/#comment-56234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14536#comment-56234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.
That means, it&#039;s not about principles but about causes.
It&#039;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#039;t yet found &quot;their&quot; war - the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#039;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#039;ve found their cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.<br />
That means, it&#8217;s not about principles but about causes.<br />
It&#8217;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#8217;t yet found &#8220;their&#8221; war &#8211; the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#8217;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#8217;ve found their cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrocles		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/fort-worth-star-telegram-on-the-barton-starbucks-fuss/#comment-56235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14536#comment-56235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.
That means, it&#039;s not about principles but about causes.
It&#039;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#039;t yet found &quot;their&quot; war - the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#039;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#039;ve found their cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.<br />
That means, it&#8217;s not about principles but about causes.<br />
It&#8217;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#8217;t yet found &#8220;their&#8221; war &#8211; the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#8217;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#8217;ve found their cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrocles		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/fort-worth-star-telegram-on-the-barton-starbucks-fuss/#comment-77413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14536#comment-77413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.
That means, it&#039;s not about principles but about causes.
It&#039;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#039;t yet found &quot;their&quot; war - the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#039;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#039;ve found their cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.<br />
That means, it&#8217;s not about principles but about causes.<br />
It&#8217;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#8217;t yet found &#8220;their&#8221; war &#8211; the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#8217;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#8217;ve found their cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrocles		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2013/06/12/fort-worth-star-telegram-on-the-barton-starbucks-fuss/#comment-77419</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=14536#comment-77419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.
That means, it&#039;s not about principles but about causes.
It&#039;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#039;t yet found &quot;their&quot; war - the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#039;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#039;ve found their cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this general argument against boycotts must be taken seriously. In some months or years, we will see that the people who now speak against boycotts have found a cause where they support a boycott.<br />
That means, it&#8217;s not about principles but about causes.<br />
It&#8217;s like people telling you they are against war, because they haven&#8217;t yet found &#8220;their&#8221; war &#8211; the war which they feel  is worthwile. You mustn&#8217;t argue with them, you only have to wait till they&#8217;ve found their cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
