Just because gay people are not a distinct ethnic or racial group, why does that mean they don’t need protection or respect? In a world that treats gay people the way it has, surely they need all the protection and respect they can get.

Well, well, well…. that is your opinion and that of your pro-gay sex co-travellers. Most Africans don’t believe that gayism should be protected at all. And that includes yours truly.

Yes, gay ism as you seem to need to call it, is simply a deviation, nothing more. But why then do you need to persecute it?

To prevent Bush Fires from spreading, you need to have the fire extinguisher and water ready. From a cultural and health-wise angle, gayism is a dangerous form of sexual deviance and we must start early before the Euro-American Gay Lobby captures the continent as it has done in the Western world and parts of Latin America. By the way, we don’t plan to “persecute” anybody, but PROSECUTIONS will be pursued in accordance with the law.

Frightening people into hiding their sexuality only discourages them from dealing as sensibly as possible with the reality if their lives: that increases risk rather than reducing it.

South Africa with all their western-style pro-gay laws maintains one of the highest HIV/AIDS infection rates in Africa and in the entire World—-double-digit infection rates (>20%). Infection rates in Uganda are way…way… way below those of pro-gay South Africa. I accept that man-woman sexual relations remains the main means of catching HIV in our nation. But we don’t need to complicate the matter by allowing gay sex practitioners to run riot with gay propaganda—distributing leaflets; holding press conferences; radio talk shows; gay parades—-all in a bid to help “youths confused with their sexuality”. We certainly don’t need the pro-gay UNESCO booklet sent to Ugandan schools without government approval. That action rightly got the UNESCO boss in Kampala expelled from the country.

Current best practice on blood donation as I best understand it is that anyone who has multiple partners – gay or straight – should not donate.

I don’t know which planet you live on, but here on Earth, it is a well known fact that the most efficient vectors of HIV/AIDS are gay sex practitioners and intraveneous drug users who share needles. We know from America’s Centre For Diseases and Control (CDC) that gayism is the best means of guaranteeing that you will get AIDS. The chances of getting HIV from gay sex is several orders of magnitude much higher than in the normal man-woman sexual relations. So the best practice is to continue to permanently ban gay sex practitioners from bringing their high-risk blood anywhere near a Hospital Blood Bank.

Oh, and gayism has been a part of your culture: just because you have such a cruel view of such people doesn’t mean they weren’t there

Well….apart from the abominable sex crime of gayism, robbery, rape, murder and fraud (among others) have been with us for such a long time. This does not mean that these crimes were part of our culture. I have never denied that gay sex practitioners ever existed in Africa in pre-colonial times. Like I said in my earlier posted comment, these people were probably hidden away from sight because they knew that their sexual behaviour was unAfrican, degrading and inhuman.

Nowonder Africa is failing. Always going backwards. And it all comes down to religion….

What a nonsensical statement !!! So UAE and Malaysia that have anti-gay laws in their stature books are “backward nations”? Have you ever been to Dubai or Abu Dhabi? Have you ever been to Kuala-Lampur? Are you saying that decriminalizing gayism will suddenly transform African nations to rich nations? Was England a poor home nation of the UK prior to the 1967 decriminalization of gayism? Was West Germany poor prior to the 1977 decriminalization of sexual deviance? Is Singapore a backward nation for refusing to scrap its anti-gay laws (which it barely enforces like some African territories such as Ghana, Southern Nigeria and Botswana)? Are African nations WITHOUT any anti-gay laws such as DR Congo; Congo Republic; Gabon and Benin Republic much richer than African countries WITH anti-gay laws such as Cameroun, Mauritius, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia, etc?

… two people are doing in the privacy of their own bedroom.

Do you even read what you write? Are gay weddings conducted in the privacy of people’s bedrooms? Are gay adoptions peformed in the bedroom? Are half-naked gay sex practitioners gallivanting about the streets of Western capitals in celebration of the “PRIDE” in their bedrooms? Are those street parades happening within the privacy of people’s bedrooms? Are the promotion of gayism in press-conferences; leaflets; radio stations; etc; happening in the privacy of the bedroom?

(It would be a pity if several EU, and other, countries decide that they wish to exercise their legitimate right not to fund regimes engaged in terroristic activities against minorities. Ordinary Ugandans could lose out. But what happens next is probably up to ‘car-cash’ MPs now.)