<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Charisma recycles 2004 article, gets lots of attention, then goes away. Alan, at the beach, knows nothing about it	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/07/20/charisma-recycles-2004-article-gets-lots-of-attention-then-goes-away-alan-at-the-beach-know-nothing-is-happening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/07/20/charisma-recycles-2004-article-gets-lots-of-attention-then-goes-away-alan-at-the-beach-know-nothing-is-happening/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:42:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Teresa		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/07/20/charisma-recycles-2004-article-gets-lots-of-attention-then-goes-away-alan-at-the-beach-know-nothing-is-happening/#comment-61590</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teresa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11816#comment-61590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very disturbing, indeed.  Yes, Michael, Charisma needs to do exactly what you&#039;ve pointed out.



I do think, however, there&#039;s some other important stuff happening in the last couple of days:  Nicolosi&#039;s admission that &#039;he doesn&#039;t cure gay&#039;s&#039; ... and, that gays will always have some level of same-sex attraction.  Why is that flying under the radar?  This is a huge disclosure from the chief advocate of Reparative Therapy.



Also, John Paulk&#039;s recent story ... perhaps, a pending divorce; perhaps, dating a man and being seen at homosexual establishments.



The whole &#039;change&#039; world seems to be imploding.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disturbing, indeed.  Yes, Michael, Charisma needs to do exactly what you&#8217;ve pointed out.</p>
<p>I do think, however, there&#8217;s some other important stuff happening in the last couple of days:  Nicolosi&#8217;s admission that &#8216;he doesn&#8217;t cure gay&#8217;s&#8217; &#8230; and, that gays will always have some level of same-sex attraction.  Why is that flying under the radar?  This is a huge disclosure from the chief advocate of Reparative Therapy.</p>
<p>Also, John Paulk&#8217;s recent story &#8230; perhaps, a pending divorce; perhaps, dating a man and being seen at homosexual establishments.</p>
<p>The whole &#8216;change&#8217; world seems to be imploding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Bussee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/07/20/charisma-recycles-2004-article-gets-lots-of-attention-then-goes-away-alan-at-the-beach-know-nothing-is-happening/#comment-61589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bussee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11816#comment-61589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I strongly encourage your readers to review the entire article.  It&#039;s pretty disgusting and I can understand why Alan is ashamed of it.  Scott Lively has written tamer stuff.



Yes, Alan wrote it 8 years ago, but he never retracted it. Today, Charisma took advantage of Alan&#039;s mistake. Let&#039;s not forget that Alan DID write it and he DID believe it.  



I don&#039;t think it&#039;s enough to say, &quot;Sorry about the confusion&quot;. Alan needs to explain why he no longer believes those things -- point by point  -- and then ask Charisma to print it.



And of course, Charisma magazine owes the public (and Alan) a full explanation, retraction and apology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly encourage your readers to review the entire article.  It&#8217;s pretty disgusting and I can understand why Alan is ashamed of it.  Scott Lively has written tamer stuff.</p>
<p>Yes, Alan wrote it 8 years ago, but he never retracted it. Today, Charisma took advantage of Alan&#8217;s mistake. Let&#8217;s not forget that Alan DID write it and he DID believe it.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s enough to say, &#8220;Sorry about the confusion&#8221;. Alan needs to explain why he no longer believes those things &#8212; point by point  &#8212; and then ask Charisma to print it.</p>
<p>And of course, Charisma magazine owes the public (and Alan) a full explanation, retraction and apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Teresa		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/07/20/charisma-recycles-2004-article-gets-lots-of-attention-then-goes-away-alan-at-the-beach-know-nothing-is-happening/#comment-86014</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teresa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11816#comment-86014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very disturbing, indeed.  Yes, Michael, Charisma needs to do exactly what you&#039;ve pointed out.



I do think, however, there&#039;s some other important stuff happening in the last couple of days:  Nicolosi&#039;s admission that &#039;he doesn&#039;t cure gay&#039;s&#039; ... and, that gays will always have some level of same-sex attraction.  Why is that flying under the radar?  This is a huge disclosure from the chief advocate of Reparative Therapy.



Also, John Paulk&#039;s recent story ... perhaps, a pending divorce; perhaps, dating a man and being seen at homosexual establishments.



The whole &#039;change&#039; world seems to be imploding.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disturbing, indeed.  Yes, Michael, Charisma needs to do exactly what you&#8217;ve pointed out.</p>
<p>I do think, however, there&#8217;s some other important stuff happening in the last couple of days:  Nicolosi&#8217;s admission that &#8216;he doesn&#8217;t cure gay&#8217;s&#8217; &#8230; and, that gays will always have some level of same-sex attraction.  Why is that flying under the radar?  This is a huge disclosure from the chief advocate of Reparative Therapy.</p>
<p>Also, John Paulk&#8217;s recent story &#8230; perhaps, a pending divorce; perhaps, dating a man and being seen at homosexual establishments.</p>
<p>The whole &#8216;change&#8217; world seems to be imploding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Bussee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/07/20/charisma-recycles-2004-article-gets-lots-of-attention-then-goes-away-alan-at-the-beach-know-nothing-is-happening/#comment-85181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bussee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11816#comment-85181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I strongly encourage your readers to review the entire article.  It&#039;s pretty disgusting and I can understand why Alan is ashamed of it.  Scott Lively has written tamer stuff.



Yes, Alan wrote it 8 years ago, but he never retracted it. Today, Charisma took advantage of Alan&#039;s mistake. Let&#039;s not forget that Alan DID write it and he DID believe it.  



I don&#039;t think it&#039;s enough to say, &quot;Sorry about the confusion&quot;. Alan needs to explain why he no longer believes those things -- point by point  -- and then ask Charisma to print it.



And of course, Charisma magazine owes the public (and Alan) a full explanation, retraction and apology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly encourage your readers to review the entire article.  It&#8217;s pretty disgusting and I can understand why Alan is ashamed of it.  Scott Lively has written tamer stuff.</p>
<p>Yes, Alan wrote it 8 years ago, but he never retracted it. Today, Charisma took advantage of Alan&#8217;s mistake. Let&#8217;s not forget that Alan DID write it and he DID believe it.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s enough to say, &#8220;Sorry about the confusion&#8221;. Alan needs to explain why he no longer believes those things &#8212; point by point  &#8212; and then ask Charisma to print it.</p>
<p>And of course, Charisma magazine owes the public (and Alan) a full explanation, retraction and apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
