<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why is there no coverage at the Christian Post about Richard Land&#8217;s troubles?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/04/20/why-is-there-no-coverage-at-the-christian-post-about-richard-lands-troubles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/04/20/why-is-there-no-coverage-at-the-christian-post-about-richard-lands-troubles/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/04/20/why-is-there-no-coverage-at-the-christian-post-about-richard-lands-troubles/#comment-80575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11424#comment-80575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Glad to hear the Obamas have paid 31% of their gross income in tax (in line with what the tax nominally requires, so the Christian Post suggests).  That&#039;s encouraging, especially when so many of the well-off pay a so much smaller percentage, while those who are less well-off often pay up at around the 30% mark.



(While I&#039;m all in favour of generous charitable giving - and try to &#039;do my bit&#039; myself - I think it&#039;s worth remembering that &#039;tithing&#039; was probably first deemed a &#039;requirement&#039; in the days when general taxation as we understand it today - which in a sense is what tithing itself perhaps originally was -  was not applied on an annual basis.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear the Obamas have paid 31% of their gross income in tax (in line with what the tax nominally requires, so the Christian Post suggests).  That&#8217;s encouraging, especially when so many of the well-off pay a so much smaller percentage, while those who are less well-off often pay up at around the 30% mark.</p>
<p>(While I&#8217;m all in favour of generous charitable giving &#8211; and try to &#8216;do my bit&#8217; myself &#8211; I think it&#8217;s worth remembering that &#8216;tithing&#8217; was probably first deemed a &#8216;requirement&#8217; in the days when general taxation as we understand it today &#8211; which in a sense is what tithing itself perhaps originally was &#8211;  was not applied on an annual basis.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Roberts		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/04/20/why-is-there-no-coverage-at-the-christian-post-about-richard-lands-troubles/#comment-60734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11424#comment-60734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Christian Post started out with what seemed like an attempt to be even-handed, albeit from a Christian POV.  However, at some point in the last year or two, the quality of the writing there went downhill and made a decidedly partisan turn for the worse.  Even basic fact checking suffers now.  I don&#039;t see anything to make them stand out from the crowd of mediocre outlets which currently plague that venue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Christian Post started out with what seemed like an attempt to be even-handed, albeit from a Christian POV.  However, at some point in the last year or two, the quality of the writing there went downhill and made a decidedly partisan turn for the worse.  Even basic fact checking suffers now.  I don&#8217;t see anything to make them stand out from the crowd of mediocre outlets which currently plague that venue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Roberts		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/04/20/why-is-there-no-coverage-at-the-christian-post-about-richard-lands-troubles/#comment-75174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11424#comment-75174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Christian Post started out with what seemed like an attempt to be even-handed, albeit from a Christian POV.  However, at some point in the last year or two, the quality of the writing there went downhill and made a decidedly partisan turn for the worse.  Even basic fact checking suffers now.  I don&#039;t see anything to make them stand out from the crowd of mediocre outlets which currently plague that venue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Christian Post started out with what seemed like an attempt to be even-handed, albeit from a Christian POV.  However, at some point in the last year or two, the quality of the writing there went downhill and made a decidedly partisan turn for the worse.  Even basic fact checking suffers now.  I don&#8217;t see anything to make them stand out from the crowd of mediocre outlets which currently plague that venue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/04/20/why-is-there-no-coverage-at-the-christian-post-about-richard-lands-troubles/#comment-60733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11424#comment-60733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[( Judging by the comments on the CP article, the anti-Obama article is getting somewhat &#039;mixed&#039; reviews, with some commenters expressing reservations about its apparently &#039;partisan&#039; nature, and others making some [IMHO] well-informed remarks about tithing. :-) )]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>( Judging by the comments on the CP article, the anti-Obama article is getting somewhat &#8216;mixed&#8217; reviews, with some commenters expressing reservations about its apparently &#8216;partisan&#8217; nature, and others making some [IMHO] well-informed remarks about tithing. 🙂 )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/04/20/why-is-there-no-coverage-at-the-christian-post-about-richard-lands-troubles/#comment-75177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11424#comment-75177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[( Judging by the comments on the CP article, the anti-Obama article is getting somewhat &#039;mixed&#039; reviews, with some commenters expressing reservations about its apparently &#039;partisan&#039; nature, and others making some [IMHO] well-informed remarks about tithing. :-) )]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>( Judging by the comments on the CP article, the anti-Obama article is getting somewhat &#8216;mixed&#8217; reviews, with some commenters expressing reservations about its apparently &#8216;partisan&#8217; nature, and others making some [IMHO] well-informed remarks about tithing. 🙂 )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
