“then one of three things must be true:”

there is another possibility as well:

4) She doesn’t believe the DoS organizers when they say it is simply about preventing bullying.

“There is no proof that there’s ever anything like a gay, lesbian or bisexual or transgendered child, or teen or human.” (Source: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/harvey-theres-no-proof-lgbt-people-exist)

Kinda hard to be against anti-gay bullying when you don’t even think there is such a thing as an LGBT child.

I would figure that she is ignorant about what DoS is about.

She is talking about the Day of Silence. The entire purpose of the Day of Silence is to raise awareness of and call an end to anti-gay bullying.

When Ms. Harvey says the DoS is sinful and dishonoring to God, then one of three things must be true:

1. She is saying, as I have suggested, that calling for an end of bullying of LGBT children is what she is calling sinful.

2. She is ignorant of what the DoS is actually about.

3. She is intentionally lying about what the DoS is about.

If she wishes to deny that #1 is her intent despite her rather clear words condemnation of a day dedicated to putting an end to anti-gay bullying, then she will have to cop to #2 or #3.

That’s not what she is saying. She is saying that supporting gays as a normal variation is dishonoring to God. I don’t agree with her. I doubt she really means that bullying is honoring to God.

Putting words in her mouth.

So according to Ms. Harvey, promoting the notion that LGBT children should not be bullied is sin and dishonors God?

“She is either “believing” something for which goes against all evidence”

I know of people who would say the same thing about christians.

” or she is being dishonest about which she lies. ”

What you are doing is using your own prejudices about Ms. Harvey to “disbelieve” other possible explanations for her statements/actions. Which is what she does (although to a much greater extent) with regards to glbt people.