<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Montgomery County, MD: PFOX is not an alternative, it is part of the problem	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 17:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: StraightGrandmother		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-74065</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StraightGrandmother]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 17:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-74065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Events are unfolding so rapidly in the last month it is hard to keep up. 



Warren The Southern Poverty Law Center runs two big articles in it&#039;s Sprin Intelligence Report, one on NARTH, and one on The American College of Pediatricians. I think your readers might like to be aware of this. I read the NARTH article but jsut today found the American College of Pediatricians Article. Remember Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons, who we had l-o-n-g discussions on, is a member of both of these organizations. [Note* after the exposure on this website and others, Dr. Fitzgibbons in now reporting on research accurately, at least the public comments I have seen him make. I am happy with that.]



http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/-science-for-homophobes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Events are unfolding so rapidly in the last month it is hard to keep up. </p>
<p>Warren The Southern Poverty Law Center runs two big articles in it&#8217;s Sprin Intelligence Report, one on NARTH, and one on The American College of Pediatricians. I think your readers might like to be aware of this. I read the NARTH article but jsut today found the American College of Pediatricians Article. Remember Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons, who we had l-o-n-g discussions on, is a member of both of these organizations. [Note* after the exposure on this website and others, Dr. Fitzgibbons in now reporting on research accurately, at least the public comments I have seen him make. I am happy with that.]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/-science-for-homophobes" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/-science-for-homophobes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StraightGrandmother		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-60353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StraightGrandmother]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-60353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Events are unfolding so rapidly in the last month it is hard to keep up. 



Warren The Southern Poverty Law Center runs two big articles in it&#039;s Sprin Intelligence Report, one on NARTH, and one on The American College of Pediatricians. I think your readers might like to be aware of this. I read the NARTH article but jsut today found the American College of Pediatricians Article. Remember Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons, who we had l-o-n-g discussions on, is a member of both of these organizations. [Note* after the exposure on this website and others, Dr. Fitzgibbons in now reporting on research accurately, at least the public comments I have seen him make. I am happy with that.]



http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/-science-for-homophobes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Events are unfolding so rapidly in the last month it is hard to keep up. </p>
<p>Warren The Southern Poverty Law Center runs two big articles in it&#8217;s Sprin Intelligence Report, one on NARTH, and one on The American College of Pediatricians. I think your readers might like to be aware of this. I read the NARTH article but jsut today found the American College of Pediatricians Article. Remember Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons, who we had l-o-n-g discussions on, is a member of both of these organizations. [Note* after the exposure on this website and others, Dr. Fitzgibbons in now reporting on research accurately, at least the public comments I have seen him make. I am happy with that.]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/-science-for-homophobes" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/-science-for-homophobes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrocles		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-60352</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-60352</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Innate&quot; was used unwisely. &quot;Innate&quot; means neither &quot;essential&quot; (a concept not highly estimated in modern science) nor &quot;determined, amongst others, by biological factors&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Innate&#8221; was used unwisely. &#8220;Innate&#8221; means neither &#8220;essential&#8221; (a concept not highly estimated in modern science) nor &#8220;determined, amongst others, by biological factors&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrocles		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-74050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrocles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-74050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Innate&quot; was used unwisely. &quot;Innate&quot; means neither &quot;essential&quot; (a concept not highly estimated in modern science) nor &quot;determined, amongst others, by biological factors&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Innate&#8221; was used unwisely. &#8220;Innate&#8221; means neither &#8220;essential&#8221; (a concept not highly estimated in modern science) nor &#8220;determined, amongst others, by biological factors&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: William		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-60351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-60351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that the problem is that groups like PFOX talk as though any evidence against biological theories or the inconclusiveness of the evidence for such theories constitutes positive evidence that their own theories are correct. Of course it constitutes no such thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the problem is that groups like PFOX talk as though any evidence against biological theories or the inconclusiveness of the evidence for such theories constitutes positive evidence that their own theories are correct. Of course it constitutes no such thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StraightGrandmother		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-60350</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StraightGrandmother]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-60350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ken, can you kindly drop me an e-mail at my forum name and then Google Mail?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, can you kindly drop me an e-mail at my forum name and then Google Mail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StraightGrandmother		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-60349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StraightGrandmother]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-60349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find that this brochure endorsed by all major medical associations covers this topic in full.

This brochure is for School Staff.



http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/just-the-facts.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that this brochure endorsed by all major medical associations covers this topic in full.</p>
<p>This brochure is for School Staff.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/just-the-facts.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/just-the-facts.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: William		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-74058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-74058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that the problem is that groups like PFOX talk as though any evidence against biological theories or the inconclusiveness of the evidence for such theories constitutes positive evidence that their own theories are correct. Of course it constitutes no such thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the problem is that groups like PFOX talk as though any evidence against biological theories or the inconclusiveness of the evidence for such theories constitutes positive evidence that their own theories are correct. Of course it constitutes no such thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-60348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-60348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Spriggs&#039; quotation from the APA is misleading in other ways as well.  While the APA properly cites that it is unknown exactly what determines a person&#039;s orientation, Spriggs&#039; quote is designed to mislead about what factors are involved.  The research DOES show that the factors cited (genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences) as well as others, ARE involved in forming both a person&#039;s orientation and identity.  What is inconclusive is to what extent they contribute, what other possible factors are involved, and how the various factors interact.  Spriggs&#039; quote misleads (and I suspect by design) the reader into thinking it is inconclusive if biological factors are involved at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spriggs&#8217; quotation from the APA is misleading in other ways as well.  While the APA properly cites that it is unknown exactly what determines a person&#8217;s orientation, Spriggs&#8217; quote is designed to mislead about what factors are involved.  The research DOES show that the factors cited (genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences) as well as others, ARE involved in forming both a person&#8217;s orientation and identity.  What is inconclusive is to what extent they contribute, what other possible factors are involved, and how the various factors interact.  Spriggs&#8217; quote misleads (and I suspect by design) the reader into thinking it is inconclusive if biological factors are involved at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StraightGrandmother		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2012/03/11/pfoxmontgomery/#comment-74044</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StraightGrandmother]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=11262#comment-74044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ken, can you kindly drop me an e-mail at my forum name and then Google Mail?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, can you kindly drop me an e-mail at my forum name and then Google Mail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
