Comments on: No change of status for Uganda's anti-gay bill https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/09/08/no-change-of-status-for-ugandas-anti-gay-bill/ A [retired] college psychology professor's observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues Wed, 30 May 2018 18:59:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Maazi NCO https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/09/08/no-change-of-status-for-ugandas-anti-gay-bill/#comment-86023 Wed, 30 May 2018 18:59:22 +0000 http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=10097#comment-86023

No change of status for Uganda’s anti-gay bill

Warren—You know very well that your blog serves as the central news agency for nearly all the propagandist websites run by the Euro-American Gay Lobby. I have to say that being a reservoir of “original” information (regardless of its quality 😀 ) imposes upon you a “heavy responsibility”. You are failing in your duty to serve as a fine “fountain of knowledge” for the gay sex militants
You report that there is no change in the status of the bill, but you fail to specify the nature of the “status” to the desperate owners of the gay sex propagandist website who depend heavily on you. What is the nature of the “status? Is it “unshelved bill status” or “shelved bill status” or “re-shelved bill status” or a combination of all three? These are important information that the foreign propagandists would need in order to instruct their paid-up Uganda-based puppet activists.

]]> By: Richard Willmer https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/09/08/no-change-of-status-for-ugandas-anti-gay-bill/#comment-73881 Wed, 30 May 2018 17:31:01 +0000 http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=10097#comment-73881 I would say that Warren’s blog usefully complements what others get from other sources. It should be remembered that Warren’s sources lie in ‘christian’ and parliamentary circles, while others may have ‘government’ contacts or sources in human rights fraternity.
As for the ‘status’ of the Bill: it was unclear a week ago, and is still unclear now – hence no change (as Warren says)! We know the Government doesn’t want it (for essentially economic reasons) and that some MPs definitely do want it. We also know that at two least opposition leaders are very much opposed to Bahati’s proposed slaughter-fest. We suspect that support may be declining in the Parliament, and this is why Langa feels the need to make threatening noises to MPs.

]]> By: Richard Willmer https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/09/08/no-change-of-status-for-ugandas-anti-gay-bill/#comment-52827 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:13:16 +0000 http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=10097#comment-52827 I would say that Warren’s blog usefully complements what others get from other sources. It should be remembered that Warren’s sources lie in ‘christian’ and parliamentary circles, while others may have ‘government’ contacts or sources in human rights fraternity.
As for the ‘status’ of the Bill: it was unclear a week ago, and is still unclear now – hence no change (as Warren says)! We know the Government doesn’t want it (for essentially economic reasons) and that some MPs definitely do want it. We also know that at two least opposition leaders are very much opposed to Bahati’s proposed slaughter-fest. We suspect that support may be declining in the Parliament, and this is why Langa feels the need to make threatening noises to MPs.

]]> By: Maazi NCO https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/09/08/no-change-of-status-for-ugandas-anti-gay-bill/#comment-52826 Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:46:10 +0000 http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=10097#comment-52826

No change of status for Uganda’s anti-gay bill

Warren—You know very well that your blog serves as the central news agency for nearly all the propagandist websites run by the Euro-American Gay Lobby. I have to say that being a reservoir of “original” information (regardless of its quality 😀 ) imposes upon you a “heavy responsibility”. You are failing in your duty to serve as a fine “fountain of knowledge” for the gay sex militants
You report that there is no change in the status of the bill, but you fail to specify the nature of the “status” to the desperate owners of the gay sex propagandist website who depend heavily on you. What is the nature of the “status? Is it “unshelved bill status” or “shelved bill status” or “re-shelved bill status” or a combination of all three? These are important information that the foreign propagandists would need in order to instruct their paid-up Uganda-based puppet activists.

]]>