From the RD article…. Slater explained that sexuality is referenced under the topic of “morality, public order, and the general welfare in a democratic society.” She said that nations have the right to regulate sexuality for those purposes.

The World Congress of Families has a new declaration out; they seem to love putting out ‘declarations’ or ‘manifesto’ from various cities. The new one is a Declaration from the Moscow Demographic Summit. It states in part:

We are alarmed by the fact that the family institution is in a state of grave social crisis which consists in the destruction of universal family, conjugal and parental roles based on traditional family values; in the disruption of the reproductive function of the family; in an epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, caused by the imposition of contraceptive thinking (in terms of safe sex) and destructive premarital and extramarital sex patterns; in widespread divorce; in the spreading of cohabitation without marriage; in increasing numbers of single?parent families; a wave of social deviations (abortions, homosexuality, paedophilia, drug addiction, refusal of marriage and childbearing (the child?free phenomenon), prostitution, pornography, etc.); disruption of the process of socialization of young generations; cutting of ties among relatives and alienation of different generations within one family, etc.
We call on the governments of all nations and on international institutions to develop immediately a pro?family demographic policy and to adopt a special international pro?family strategy and action plan aimed at consolidating family and marriage, protecting human life from conception to natural death, increasing birth rate, and averting the menace of depopulation. Nowadays, in most countries of the world, against the backdrop of devaluation of family values, the rights of the family are prejudiced in the information space, in the legal and socioeconomic spheres.

It makes one wonder if all the CWF supposed ‘social deviations’ should in some way be legislated against then will FWI and the WCF be proposing that the refusal of marriage and childbearing (the child?free phenomenon) should in some way be legislated against, or made unbearable by governments? I might wonder if making women who are single over the age of 21 (or married yet not pregnant) illegal may not be on their agenda, then perhaps exhorbitant taxation on the single person may be.
They do go on to state:

We also insist on putting an end to interference with private life of the family under the pretexts of so?called “family planning”; “protection of the rights of the child”, and “gender equality”. We consider it inadmissible to continue the policy of birth control, regarding this policy as one of the greatest threats to the survival of humankind and as a means of incursive discrimination against the family. Every family has the right of reproductive choice, inviolability of family life and bringing up their children in harmony with the culture and traditions of a specific country. Parents have absolute primary and priority right to support, bring up and educate their children.
We call on public associations, religious communities, entrepreneurs, media workers, and all people of good will to get involved in combating the above?mentioned threats that destroy family and marriage.

And they support the definition of the family codified in the final document of the Dialogue of Civilizations World Public Forum that took place on 7–11 October 2010 on the Greek island of Rhodes (see the same WCF link). But in that document a family only occurs if the man and woman are willing (and presumably able?) “to give birth to, socialize, and bring up children.” And so they speak of some choices families make as social deviations.
Somewhere along the line I think they have gone overboard not only against rights for gay peoples but also towards a loss of personal liberty for women especially, but all in general if marriage and childbearing is to somehow be mandated in their perfect world.
…

From the RD article…. Slater explained that sexuality is referenced under the topic of “morality, public order, and the general welfare in a democratic society.” She said that nations have the right to regulate sexuality for those purposes.

The World Congress of Families has a new declaration out; they seem to love putting out ‘declarations’ or ‘manifesto’ from various cities. The new one is a Declaration from the Moscow Demographic Summit. It states in part:

We are alarmed by the fact that the family institution is in a state of grave social crisis which consists in the destruction of universal family, conjugal and parental roles based on traditional family values; in the disruption of the reproductive function of the family; in an epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, caused by the imposition of contraceptive thinking (in terms of safe sex) and destructive premarital and extramarital sex patterns; in widespread divorce; in the spreading of cohabitation without marriage; in increasing numbers of single?parent families; a wave of social deviations (abortions, homosexuality, paedophilia, drug addiction, refusal of marriage and childbearing (the child?free phenomenon), prostitution, pornography, etc.); disruption of the process of socialization of young generations; cutting of ties among relatives and alienation of different generations within one family, etc.
We call on the governments of all nations and on international institutions to develop immediately a pro?family demographic policy and to adopt a special international pro?family strategy and action plan aimed at consolidating family and marriage, protecting human life from conception to natural death, increasing birth rate, and averting the menace of depopulation. Nowadays, in most countries of the world, against the backdrop of devaluation of family values, the rights of the family are prejudiced in the information space, in the legal and socioeconomic spheres.

It makes one wonder if all the CWF supposed ‘social deviations’ should in some way be legislated against then will FWI and the WCF be proposing that the refusal of marriage and childbearing (the child?free phenomenon) should in some way be legislated against, or made unbearable by governments? I might wonder if making women who are single over the age of 21 (or married yet not pregnant) illegal may not be on their agenda, then perhaps exhorbitant taxation on the single person may be.
They do go on to state:

We also insist on putting an end to interference with private life of the family under the pretexts of so?called “family planning”; “protection of the rights of the child”, and “gender equality”. We consider it inadmissible to continue the policy of birth control, regarding this policy as one of the greatest threats to the survival of humankind and as a means of incursive discrimination against the family. Every family has the right of reproductive choice, inviolability of family life and bringing up their children in harmony with the culture and traditions of a specific country. Parents have absolute primary and priority right to support, bring up and educate their children.
We call on public associations, religious communities, entrepreneurs, media workers, and all people of good will to get involved in combating the above?mentioned threats that destroy family and marriage.

And they support the definition of the family codified in the final document of the Dialogue of Civilizations World Public Forum that took place on 7–11 October 2010 on the Greek island of Rhodes (see the same WCF link). But in that document a family only occurs if the man and woman are willing (and presumably able?) “to give birth to, socialize, and bring up children.” And so they speak of some choices families make as social deviations.
Somewhere along the line I think they have gone overboard not only against rights for gay peoples but also towards a loss of personal liberty for women especially, but all in general if marriage and childbearing is to somehow be mandated in their perfect world.
…