<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CNN Belief Blog examines congruence paradigm amid Bachmann revelations	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/07/18/cnn-belief-blog-examines-congruence-paradigm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/07/18/cnn-belief-blog-examines-congruence-paradigm/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 20:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/07/18/cnn-belief-blog-examines-congruence-paradigm/#comment-93552</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 20:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9726#comment-93552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[David B -
&lt;blockquote&gt;n 1980 Lutherans, most Episcopalians, Catholics, Evangelicals, Fundamentalists (every one who espouses the Apostles Creed, for Example) all concurred with the sinfulness of homosexual behavior and it&#039;s disqualification for Christian leadership.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Only in print David.  I know for a fact that lay people and leaders of some of those different &quot;denominations&quot;  did not believe this and were working on changing things.  How many, I suppose we will never know because until the time you mentioned, it was a crime in most states to live as a gay person so some things had to happen out of the spotlight as it were.  You seem to think that the changes in these churches started with Episcopalians electing an openly gay Bishop - you&#039;d be wrong to do that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David B &#8211;</p>
<blockquote><p>n 1980 Lutherans, most Episcopalians, Catholics, Evangelicals, Fundamentalists (every one who espouses the Apostles Creed, for Example) all concurred with the sinfulness of homosexual behavior and it&#8217;s disqualification for Christian leadership.</p></blockquote>
<p>Only in print David.  I know for a fact that lay people and leaders of some of those different &#8220;denominations&#8221;  did not believe this and were working on changing things.  How many, I suppose we will never know because until the time you mentioned, it was a crime in most states to live as a gay person so some things had to happen out of the spotlight as it were.  You seem to think that the changes in these churches started with Episcopalians electing an openly gay Bishop &#8211; you&#8217;d be wrong to do that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Blakeslee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/07/18/cnn-belief-blog-examines-congruence-paradigm/#comment-93541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Blakeslee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9726#comment-93541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unitarians, I believe, do not acknowledge the Deity of Christ...which interferes with a fundamentally accepted definition of Christianity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unitarians, I believe, do not acknowledge the Deity of Christ&#8230;which interferes with a fundamentally accepted definition of Christianity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/07/18/cnn-belief-blog-examines-congruence-paradigm/#comment-93540</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9726#comment-93540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[David - I was thinking along the same lines. I think for now I will keep my powder dry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; I was thinking along the same lines. I think for now I will keep my powder dry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn David		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/07/18/cnn-belief-blog-examines-congruence-paradigm/#comment-93208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 20:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9726#comment-93208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On the other side of this, I do not think what Bachmann does in his clinic is as important to his wife&#039;s campaign as the lie she may have voiced in 2006 in a debate while running for Congress.
I think it is becoming rather obvious that Michele Bachmann lied concerning her statement about her knowledge of WELS teaching on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/271889/bachmann-belonged-church-believed-pope-was-anti-christ-katrina-trinko&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Catholic Papacy as antiChrist in 2006&lt;/a&gt;.  In that statement during a debate she claimed that her pastor had commented that &quot;&lt;em&gt;he was absolutely appalled that someone would put that out&lt;/em&gt;.&quot;
But part of the&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wels.net/about-wels/doctrinal-statements/antichrist?page=0,0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WELS teaching on antiChrist&lt;/a&gt; is that a pastor should know about the teaching and her pastor, Marcus Birkholz, had been at Salem Lutheran for 21 years in 2006.   I suspect he therefore knew and was not ignorant of the teaching on the antiChrist.  So then Bachmann&#039;s 2006 statement either reported a lie her pastor told her or was a lie of itself.
Well, it is five years later and Pastor Birkholz is still at Salem Lutheran.  The Bachmanns evidently stopped attending in 2009 and then formally left just before announcing for the Presidency.  Her former pastor has said (&lt;a href=&quot;http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/15/michele-bachmann-officially-leaves-her-church/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN Religion Blog&lt;/a&gt;):
&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ve been asked to make no comments regarding them and their family.&lt;/blockquote&gt;And Bachmann is ducking the issue:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Bachmann was asked about her status with the church on Thursday at Reagan National Airport as she headed to catch a flight. When asked about her pastor, she asked, &quot;Which one?&quot; An aide quickly hustled her away, noting that they were late for a flight.
The Bachmann campaign declined to immediately respond to a request for further comment Friday.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It seems the pastor has no reason to be repentant.  He either told told Michele Bachmann the truth about WELS teaching or the conversation she reported in 2006 did not happen.  What is being hidden in all of this is likely the lie which Bachmann spoke then.
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other side of this, I do not think what Bachmann does in his clinic is as important to his wife&#8217;s campaign as the lie she may have voiced in 2006 in a debate while running for Congress.<br />
I think it is becoming rather obvious that Michele Bachmann lied concerning her statement about her knowledge of WELS teaching on the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/271889/bachmann-belonged-church-believed-pope-was-anti-christ-katrina-trinko" rel="nofollow">Catholic Papacy as antiChrist in 2006</a>.  In that statement during a debate she claimed that her pastor had commented that &#8220;<em>he was absolutely appalled that someone would put that out</em>.&#8221;<br />
But part of the<a href="http://www.wels.net/about-wels/doctrinal-statements/antichrist?page=0,0" rel="nofollow">WELS teaching on antiChrist</a> is that a pastor should know about the teaching and her pastor, Marcus Birkholz, had been at Salem Lutheran for 21 years in 2006.   I suspect he therefore knew and was not ignorant of the teaching on the antiChrist.  So then Bachmann&#8217;s 2006 statement either reported a lie her pastor told her or was a lie of itself.<br />
Well, it is five years later and Pastor Birkholz is still at Salem Lutheran.  The Bachmanns evidently stopped attending in 2009 and then formally left just before announcing for the Presidency.  Her former pastor has said (<a href="http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/15/michele-bachmann-officially-leaves-her-church/" rel="nofollow">CNN Religion Blog</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve been asked to make no comments regarding them and their family.</p></blockquote>
<p>And Bachmann is ducking the issue:</p>
<blockquote><p>Bachmann was asked about her status with the church on Thursday at Reagan National Airport as she headed to catch a flight. When asked about her pastor, she asked, &#8220;Which one?&#8221; An aide quickly hustled her away, noting that they were late for a flight.<br />
The Bachmann campaign declined to immediately respond to a request for further comment Friday.</p></blockquote>
<p>It seems the pastor has no reason to be repentant.  He either told told Michele Bachmann the truth about WELS teaching or the conversation she reported in 2006 did not happen.  What is being hidden in all of this is likely the lie which Bachmann spoke then.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gene Chase		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/07/18/cnn-belief-blog-examines-congruence-paradigm/#comment-93207</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene Chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 20:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9726#comment-93207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Warren, Moberly&#039;s non-religious presentation of reparative therapy was in  &lt;em&gt;Psychogenesis: The Early Development of Gender Identity.&lt;/em&gt;  As an Eastern Orthodox believer, she then showed it to be a Christian approach in &lt;em&gt;Homosexuality: A New Christian Ethic&lt;/em&gt;.  Although both books came out in 1983, I think that the first-mentioned is prior in both conception and printing.
Elizabeth was a theoretician, not a clinician, so she never in fact had clients on which to test her theory.  If you&#039;re writing a history, I have original correspondence from her to Nicolosi complaining that he appropriated her theory without any credit to her.
In my opinion, this is why she got fed up and left the field of psychoanalysis in favor of researching things like homeopathic cures for cancer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Warren, Moberly&#8217;s non-religious presentation of reparative therapy was in  <em>Psychogenesis: The Early Development of Gender Identity.</em>  As an Eastern Orthodox believer, she then showed it to be a Christian approach in <em>Homosexuality: A New Christian Ethic</em>.  Although both books came out in 1983, I think that the first-mentioned is prior in both conception and printing.<br />
Elizabeth was a theoretician, not a clinician, so she never in fact had clients on which to test her theory.  If you&#8217;re writing a history, I have original correspondence from her to Nicolosi complaining that he appropriated her theory without any credit to her.<br />
In my opinion, this is why she got fed up and left the field of psychoanalysis in favor of researching things like homeopathic cures for cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
