<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Roots of reparative therapy &#8211; Momism as a root of homosexuality	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/06/21/roots-of-reparative-therapy-momism-as-a-root-of-homosexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/06/21/roots-of-reparative-therapy-momism-as-a-root-of-homosexuality/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 13:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Madison		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/06/21/roots-of-reparative-therapy-momism-as-a-root-of-homosexuality/#comment-90547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9528#comment-90547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Warren, I see some recurring themes in your posts that I don&#039;t completely understand. For one, isn&#039;t there some consensus that female and male sexuality have some differences, especially as it relates to same sex attraction? Pointing out when only males are considered seems like an inaccurate jab. Also, it seems like you feel that if Bem contradicts Nicolosi who contradicts Strecker than none of them could even be partially correct. Is that a valid conclusion? I wouldn&#039;t think so. As a new parent, I am overly aware of how much psychological development is taking place with my offspring. To downplay parental impact seems absurd to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren, I see some recurring themes in your posts that I don&#8217;t completely understand. For one, isn&#8217;t there some consensus that female and male sexuality have some differences, especially as it relates to same sex attraction? Pointing out when only males are considered seems like an inaccurate jab. Also, it seems like you feel that if Bem contradicts Nicolosi who contradicts Strecker than none of them could even be partially correct. Is that a valid conclusion? I wouldn&#8217;t think so. As a new parent, I am overly aware of how much psychological development is taking place with my offspring. To downplay parental impact seems absurd to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Madison		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/06/21/roots-of-reparative-therapy-momism-as-a-root-of-homosexuality/#comment-50939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9528#comment-50939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Warren, I see some recurring themes in your posts that I don&#039;t completely understand. For one, isn&#039;t there some consensus that female and male sexuality have some differences, especially as it relates to same sex attraction? Pointing out when only males are considered seems like an inaccurate jab. Also, it seems like you feel that if Bem contradicts Nicolosi who contradicts Strecker than none of them could even be partially correct. Is that a valid conclusion? I wouldn&#039;t think so. As a new parent, I am overly aware of how much psychological development is taking place with my offspring. To downplay parental impact seems absurd to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren, I see some recurring themes in your posts that I don&#8217;t completely understand. For one, isn&#8217;t there some consensus that female and male sexuality have some differences, especially as it relates to same sex attraction? Pointing out when only males are considered seems like an inaccurate jab. Also, it seems like you feel that if Bem contradicts Nicolosi who contradicts Strecker than none of them could even be partially correct. Is that a valid conclusion? I wouldn&#8217;t think so. As a new parent, I am overly aware of how much psychological development is taking place with my offspring. To downplay parental impact seems absurd to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
