We affirm that Biblical spanking may cause temporary and superficial bruises or welts that do not constitute child abuse, but that proven brutality to a child resulting in permanent disfigurement or serious injury should be punished by law

This suggests he supported the physical abuse of Kirk by his father as a legitimate way to carry out the treatment program.

We deny that premarital and extramarital sexual relationships, promiscuity, adultery, homosexuality, bestiality, exhibitionism, pornography, adult-child sexual relations, prostitution, and sex-act entertainment, masturbation, and other sexual deviations should be sanctioned or accepted as “normal” or legal, even if done alone or by consenting partners; and that any sexual behavior that deviates from the norm of a loving, marital heterosexuality can be considered a mature, untreatable, or acceptable life-long pattern, even if the individual involved does not wish to change.
…
We affirm that the husband has final say in any family dispute, insofar as he does not violate Biblical principles; that a husband’s headship is irrevocable;
…
We deny that the state has a right to impose unrealistic standards on families; that the so-called offenses of “emotional neglect,” “emotional abuse,” “educational neglect,” etc., which form the bulk of substantiated reports of “child abuse and neglect,” are in fact crimes against children;
…
We affirm that Biblical spanking may cause temporary and superficial bruises or welts that do not constitute child abuse, but that proven brutality to a child resulting in permanent disfigurement or serious injury should be punished by law

So temporary disfigurement is fine, and there’s no such thing as emotional cruelty. And Masturbation should be illegal. As should any sex outside marriage.
This from a man who is a practicing Child Psychologist.
Warren, I commented about this many moons ago. I called for an investigation, follow-ups of this man’s patients. I want to know how many children have died. I want to know how these Hyper-Christian Hypocrites who seem devoid of empathy can get away with this for so long.
At some point, there is a restriction, not on religious belief, but on religious practice. To take the most extreme example, devout, genuine worshippers of Huitzilopochtli are not allowed to practice human sacrifice, no matter how much a core belief that may be. At what point does cult belief become a disqualifier for medical practioners who practice what they preach on children? At what point do professional organisations have a duty to step in?
I don’t know: trample not on others religions, if you don’t want yours to be trampled on in turn. But there have to be limits.
‘

Cultural standards for “femininity” and “masculinity” are too narrowly defined. We need a broader understanding of individual gifts and abilities.

Agreed.