<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The UK counseling association condemns actions of reparative therapist	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn David		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-88785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-88785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile in America &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thegavoice.com/index.php/news/georgia-news/2703-lawsuit-sheriffs-department-took-lesbian-drug-addict-to-evangelist-instead-of-rehab&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;according to the GA Voice&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;A lesbian, Amanda Booker, is suing the Bartow (Georgia) County Sheriff&#039;s Department and others after she alleges her constitutional rights were violated when she was taken to a private residence for ex-gay conversion therapy rather than to a court-mandated psychiatric hospital for her drug abuse.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile in America <a href="http://www.thegavoice.com/index.php/news/georgia-news/2703-lawsuit-sheriffs-department-took-lesbian-drug-addict-to-evangelist-instead-of-rehab" rel="nofollow">according to the GA Voice</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A lesbian, Amanda Booker, is suing the Bartow (Georgia) County Sheriff&#8217;s Department and others after she alleges her constitutional rights were violated when she was taken to a private residence for ex-gay conversion therapy rather than to a court-mandated psychiatric hospital for her drug abuse.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-88780</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-88780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard Willmer#   ~ May 28, 2011 at 6:37 am
&quot;In itself, the BACP ruling does not bar Pilkington from plying her trade. That is a matter for the courts.&quot;
However, as I understood the set up in England, if Pilkington lost her accreditation with BACP then she would no longer be eligible to receive NHS funds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Willmer#   ~ May 28, 2011 at 6:37 am<br />
&#8220;In itself, the BACP ruling does not bar Pilkington from plying her trade. That is a matter for the courts.&#8221;<br />
However, as I understood the set up in England, if Pilkington lost her accreditation with BACP then she would no longer be eligible to receive NHS funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-88777</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-88777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In other words, she can still do her stuff, but gets no &#039;tax dollars&#039; - the latter part of which sounds good to me!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, she can still do her stuff, but gets no &#8216;tax dollars&#8217; &#8211; the latter part of which sounds good to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-88775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-88775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, Lynn, it shows the often strange nature of &#039;English&#039; English (American English is more &#039;standardised&#039;): the verb &#039;to sanction&#039; means &#039;to validate&#039;, while the noun &#039;sanction&#039; means &#039;punishment&#039;!
In itself, the BACP ruling does not bar Pilkington from plying her trade.  That is a matter for the courts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Lynn, it shows the often strange nature of &#8216;English&#8217; English (American English is more &#8216;standardised&#8217;): the verb &#8216;to sanction&#8217; means &#8216;to validate&#8217;, while the noun &#8216;sanction&#8217; means &#8216;punishment&#8217;!<br />
In itself, the BACP ruling does not bar Pilkington from plying her trade.  That is a matter for the courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-50297</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 08:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-50297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Throbert,
&lt;blockquote&gt;Not so different in US English — the verb “to sanction” pretty much always means “to give or show approval; to validate.” But the noun “sanction” can mean either “approval; validation” or “punishment; disapproval,” depending on sentence context. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m not one to disapprove of a lesson in proper grammar (or word usage), but isn&#039;t this basically what Richard said above? Even though one of your noun examples was used in the negative, it seems to illustrate that the word sanction, at least as a noun, is used more to illustrate a &quot;punishment&quot; of sorts than it is to show approval.  I&#039;ll have to look into this more. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throbert,</p>
<blockquote><p>Not so different in US English — the verb “to sanction” pretty much always means “to give or show approval; to validate.” But the noun “sanction” can mean either “approval; validation” or “punishment; disapproval,” depending on sentence context. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not one to disapprove of a lesson in proper grammar (or word usage), but isn&#8217;t this basically what Richard said above? Even though one of your noun examples was used in the negative, it seems to illustrate that the word sanction, at least as a noun, is used more to illustrate a &#8220;punishment&#8221; of sorts than it is to show approval.  I&#8217;ll have to look into this more. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-79650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 04:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-79650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Throbert,
&lt;blockquote&gt;Not so different in US English &#8212; the verb &quot;to sanction&quot; pretty much always means &quot;to give or show approval; to validate.&quot; But the noun &quot;sanction&quot; can mean either &quot;approval; validation&quot; or &quot;punishment; disapproval,&quot; depending on sentence context. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m not one to disapprove of a lesson in proper grammar (or word usage), but isn&#039;t this basically what Richard said above? Even though one of your noun examples was used in the negative, it seems to illustrate that the word sanction, at least as a noun, is used more to illustrate a &quot;punishment&quot; of sorts than it is to show approval.  I&#039;ll have to look into this more. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throbert,</p>
<blockquote><p>Not so different in US English &#8212; the verb &#8220;to sanction&#8221; pretty much always means &#8220;to give or show approval; to validate.&#8221; But the noun &#8220;sanction&#8221; can mean either &#8220;approval; validation&#8221; or &#8220;punishment; disapproval,&#8221; depending on sentence context. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not one to disapprove of a lesson in proper grammar (or word usage), but isn&#8217;t this basically what Richard said above? Even though one of your noun examples was used in the negative, it seems to illustrate that the word sanction, at least as a noun, is used more to illustrate a &#8220;punishment&#8221; of sorts than it is to show approval.  I&#8217;ll have to look into this more. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-50296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-50296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK, Throbert.  Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Throbert.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Throbert McGee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-50295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Throbert McGee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 21:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-50295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, Lynn, it shows the often strange nature of ‘English’ English (American English is more ‘standardised’): the verb ‘to sanction’ means ‘to validate’, while the noun ‘sanction’ means ‘punishment’!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not so different in US English -- the verb &quot;to sanction&quot; pretty much always means &quot;to give or show approval; to validate.&quot; But the noun &quot;sanction&quot; can mean either &quot;approval; validation&quot; or &quot;punishment; disapproval,&quot; depending on sentence context.
Examples:
&lt;strong&gt;(1) &lt;/strong&gt;The Vatican representative said, &quot;We will not sanction &lt;em&gt;[verb]&lt;/em&gt; same-sex marriage.&quot; (= We won&#039;t approve it)
&lt;strong&gt;(2)&lt;/strong&gt; The Vatican representative said, &quot;We will not give sanction &lt;em&gt;[noun]&lt;/em&gt; to same-sex marriage.&quot; (= We won&#039;t approve it)
&lt;strong&gt;(3)&lt;/strong&gt; The Vatican representative said, &quot;We are prepared to issue sanctions &lt;em&gt;[noun]&lt;/em&gt; against priests who perform same-sex union ceremonies.&quot; (= We will show disapproval of it.)
Although &quot;sanction&quot; is a noun in both the second and third sentences, the preposition &quot;against&quot; in #3 makes it clear that the noun is intended to mean &quot;disapproval&quot; rather than &quot;approval.&quot; Meanwhile, #1 and #2 are synonymous even though the first uses &quot;sanction&quot; as a verb and the second as a noun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, Lynn, it shows the often strange nature of ‘English’ English (American English is more ‘standardised’): the verb ‘to sanction’ means ‘to validate’, while the noun ‘sanction’ means ‘punishment’!</p></blockquote>
<p>Not so different in US English &#8212; the verb &#8220;to sanction&#8221; pretty much always means &#8220;to give or show approval; to validate.&#8221; But the noun &#8220;sanction&#8221; can mean either &#8220;approval; validation&#8221; or &#8220;punishment; disapproval,&#8221; depending on sentence context.<br />
Examples:<br />
<strong>(1) </strong>The Vatican representative said, &#8220;We will not sanction <em>[verb]</em> same-sex marriage.&#8221; (= We won&#8217;t approve it)<br />
<strong>(2)</strong> The Vatican representative said, &#8220;We will not give sanction <em>[noun]</em> to same-sex marriage.&#8221; (= We won&#8217;t approve it)<br />
<strong>(3)</strong> The Vatican representative said, &#8220;We are prepared to issue sanctions <em>[noun]</em> against priests who perform same-sex union ceremonies.&#8221; (= We will show disapproval of it.)<br />
Although &#8220;sanction&#8221; is a noun in both the second and third sentences, the preposition &#8220;against&#8221; in #3 makes it clear that the noun is intended to mean &#8220;disapproval&#8221; rather than &#8220;approval.&#8221; Meanwhile, #1 and #2 are synonymous even though the first uses &#8220;sanction&#8221; as a verb and the second as a noun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-77025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-77025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK, Throbert.  Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Throbert.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Throbert McGee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/05/27/the-uk-counseling-association-sanctions-reparative-therapist/#comment-79655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Throbert McGee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9409#comment-79655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, Lynn, it shows the often strange nature of &#039;English&#039; English (American English is more &#039;standardised&#039;): the verb &#039;to sanction&#039; means &#039;to validate&#039;, while the noun &#039;sanction&#039; means &#039;punishment&#039;!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not so different in US English -- the verb &quot;to sanction&quot; pretty much always means &quot;to give or show approval; to validate.&quot; But the noun &quot;sanction&quot; can mean either &quot;approval; validation&quot; or &quot;punishment; disapproval,&quot; depending on sentence context.
Examples:
&lt;strong&gt;(1) &lt;/strong&gt;The Vatican representative said, &quot;We will not sanction &lt;em&gt;[verb]&lt;/em&gt; same-sex marriage.&quot; (= We won&#039;t approve it)
&lt;strong&gt;(2)&lt;/strong&gt; The Vatican representative said, &quot;We will not give sanction &lt;em&gt;[noun]&lt;/em&gt; to same-sex marriage.&quot; (= We won&#039;t approve it)
&lt;strong&gt;(3)&lt;/strong&gt; The Vatican representative said, &quot;We are prepared to issue sanctions &lt;em&gt;[noun]&lt;/em&gt; against priests who perform same-sex union ceremonies.&quot; (= We will show disapproval of it.)
Although &quot;sanction&quot; is a noun in both the second and third sentences, the preposition &quot;against&quot; in #3 makes it clear that the noun is intended to mean &quot;disapproval&quot; rather than &quot;approval.&quot; Meanwhile, #1 and #2 are synonymous even though the first uses &quot;sanction&quot; as a verb and the second as a noun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, Lynn, it shows the often strange nature of &#8216;English&#8217; English (American English is more &#8216;standardised&#8217;): the verb &#8216;to sanction&#8217; means &#8216;to validate&#8217;, while the noun &#8216;sanction&#8217; means &#8216;punishment&#8217;!</p></blockquote>
<p>Not so different in US English &#8212; the verb &#8220;to sanction&#8221; pretty much always means &#8220;to give or show approval; to validate.&#8221; But the noun &#8220;sanction&#8221; can mean either &#8220;approval; validation&#8221; or &#8220;punishment; disapproval,&#8221; depending on sentence context.<br />
Examples:<br />
<strong>(1) </strong>The Vatican representative said, &#8220;We will not sanction <em>[verb]</em> same-sex marriage.&#8221; (= We won&#8217;t approve it)<br />
<strong>(2)</strong> The Vatican representative said, &#8220;We will not give sanction <em>[noun]</em> to same-sex marriage.&#8221; (= We won&#8217;t approve it)<br />
<strong>(3)</strong> The Vatican representative said, &#8220;We are prepared to issue sanctions <em>[noun]</em> against priests who perform same-sex union ceremonies.&#8221; (= We will show disapproval of it.)<br />
Although &#8220;sanction&#8221; is a noun in both the second and third sentences, the preposition &#8220;against&#8221; in #3 makes it clear that the noun is intended to mean &#8220;disapproval&#8221; rather than &#8220;approval.&#8221; Meanwhile, #1 and #2 are synonymous even though the first uses &#8220;sanction&#8221; as a verb and the second as a noun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
