<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Letter from George Washington to an annual meeting of Quakers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/28/letter-from-george-washington-to-an-annual-meeting-of-quakers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/28/letter-from-george-washington-to-an-annual-meeting-of-quakers/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Schultheis		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/28/letter-from-george-washington-to-an-annual-meeting-of-quakers/#comment-49662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Schultheis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9126#comment-49662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ken,
Washington&#039;s use of the term &quot;Almighty God&quot; doesn&#039;t only mean the Christian god - &quot;Almighty God&quot; (the God of Abraham) is also worshiped by Jews &#038; Muslims (who share large parts of the same &quot;holy&quot; book - including Genesis).
If Washington was speaking to a non-Christian group, I have no doubt he would have been more careful - and left out the &quot;Almighty God&quot; phrase altogether.
To understand the founding fathers&#039; views on religion, please go to Wikipedia and check out &quot;deism&quot; and &quot;age of enlightenment&quot;, and especially &quot;Thomas Paine&quot;.  Understand that we were inventing England / Europe version 2, version 1 being severely troubled by centuries of wars - internal and inter-European, caused by &quot;official&quot; and dictated-by-law religious doctrine forced on the population (go to Wikipedia, look up &quot;War of the Roses&quot; and &quot;Hundred Year War&quot;, and even &quot;Henry the 8th&quot;.)
I hope the &quot;Christian Nation&quot; movement doesn&#039;t do to our land what it did to Europe - which has &quot;official state religion&quot; in many of their laws, but very few humans in their churches.  State influence on official religions is as bad for those religions as religious doctrine in law is bad for the State ... from either side it makes sense to keep &#039;em separated (proven by history in Europe).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,<br />
Washington&#8217;s use of the term &#8220;Almighty God&#8221; doesn&#8217;t only mean the Christian god &#8211; &#8220;Almighty God&#8221; (the God of Abraham) is also worshiped by Jews &amp; Muslims (who share large parts of the same &#8220;holy&#8221; book &#8211; including Genesis).<br />
If Washington was speaking to a non-Christian group, I have no doubt he would have been more careful &#8211; and left out the &#8220;Almighty God&#8221; phrase altogether.<br />
To understand the founding fathers&#8217; views on religion, please go to Wikipedia and check out &#8220;deism&#8221; and &#8220;age of enlightenment&#8221;, and especially &#8220;Thomas Paine&#8221;.  Understand that we were inventing England / Europe version 2, version 1 being severely troubled by centuries of wars &#8211; internal and inter-European, caused by &#8220;official&#8221; and dictated-by-law religious doctrine forced on the population (go to Wikipedia, look up &#8220;War of the Roses&#8221; and &#8220;Hundred Year War&#8221;, and even &#8220;Henry the 8th&#8221;.)<br />
I hope the &#8220;Christian Nation&#8221; movement doesn&#8217;t do to our land what it did to Europe &#8211; which has &#8220;official state religion&#8221; in many of their laws, but very few humans in their churches.  State influence on official religions is as bad for those religions as religious doctrine in law is bad for the State &#8230; from either side it makes sense to keep &#8217;em separated (proven by history in Europe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Schultheis		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/28/letter-from-george-washington-to-an-annual-meeting-of-quakers/#comment-90422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Schultheis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 10:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9126#comment-90422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ken,
Washington&#039;s use of the term &quot;Almighty God&quot; doesn&#039;t only mean the Christian god - &quot;Almighty God&quot; (the God of Abraham) is also worshiped by Jews &#038; Muslims (who share large parts of the same &quot;holy&quot; book - including Genesis).
If Washington was speaking to a non-Christian group, I have no doubt he would have been more careful - and left out the &quot;Almighty God&quot; phrase altogether.
To understand the founding fathers&#039; views on religion, please go to Wikipedia and check out &quot;deism&quot; and &quot;age of enlightenment&quot;, and especially &quot;Thomas Paine&quot;.  Understand that we were inventing England / Europe version 2, version 1 being severely troubled by centuries of wars - internal and inter-European, caused by &quot;official&quot; and dictated-by-law religious doctrine forced on the population (go to Wikipedia, look up &quot;War of the Roses&quot; and &quot;Hundred Year War&quot;, and even &quot;Henry the 8th&quot;.)
I hope the &quot;Christian Nation&quot; movement doesn&#039;t do to our land what it did to Europe - which has &quot;official state religion&quot; in many of their laws, but very few humans in their churches.  State influence on official religions is as bad for those religions as religious doctrine in law is bad for the State ... from either side it makes sense to keep &#039;em separated (proven by history in Europe).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,<br />
Washington&#8217;s use of the term &#8220;Almighty God&#8221; doesn&#8217;t only mean the Christian god &#8211; &#8220;Almighty God&#8221; (the God of Abraham) is also worshiped by Jews &#38; Muslims (who share large parts of the same &#8220;holy&#8221; book &#8211; including Genesis).<br />
If Washington was speaking to a non-Christian group, I have no doubt he would have been more careful &#8211; and left out the &#8220;Almighty God&#8221; phrase altogether.<br />
To understand the founding fathers&#8217; views on religion, please go to Wikipedia and check out &#8220;deism&#8221; and &#8220;age of enlightenment&#8221;, and especially &#8220;Thomas Paine&#8221;.  Understand that we were inventing England / Europe version 2, version 1 being severely troubled by centuries of wars &#8211; internal and inter-European, caused by &#8220;official&#8221; and dictated-by-law religious doctrine forced on the population (go to Wikipedia, look up &#8220;War of the Roses&#8221; and &#8220;Hundred Year War&#8221;, and even &#8220;Henry the 8th&#8221;.)<br />
I hope the &#8220;Christian Nation&#8221; movement doesn&#8217;t do to our land what it did to Europe &#8211; which has &#8220;official state religion&#8221; in many of their laws, but very few humans in their churches.  State influence on official religions is as bad for those religions as religious doctrine in law is bad for the State &#8230; from either side it makes sense to keep &#8217;em separated (proven by history in Europe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/28/letter-from-george-washington-to-an-annual-meeting-of-quakers/#comment-49661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9126#comment-49661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oft,
&lt;blockquote&gt;David L. Holmes of William and Mary, among others, writes “few founders who were Deists would have participated in either rite” [communion]
He goes on to explain Deists rejected all sacraments of any church.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I do not think you understood my post.  I suggest you read it again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oft,</p>
<blockquote><p>David L. Holmes of William and Mary, among others, writes “few founders who were Deists would have participated in either rite” [communion]<br />
He goes on to explain Deists rejected all sacraments of any church.</p></blockquote>
<p>I do not think you understood my post.  I suggest you read it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/28/letter-from-george-washington-to-an-annual-meeting-of-quakers/#comment-90414</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9126#comment-90414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oft,
&lt;blockquote&gt;David L. Holmes of William and Mary, among others, writes &quot;few founders who were Deists would have participated in either rite&quot; [communion]
He goes on to explain Deists rejected all sacraments of any church.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I do not think you understood my post.  I suggest you read it again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oft,</p>
<blockquote><p>David L. Holmes of William and Mary, among others, writes &#8220;few founders who were Deists would have participated in either rite&#8221; [communion]<br />
He goes on to explain Deists rejected all sacraments of any church.</p></blockquote>
<p>I do not think you understood my post.  I suggest you read it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/28/letter-from-george-washington-to-an-annual-meeting-of-quakers/#comment-49660</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=9126#comment-49660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These Barton posts all have a fish-in-a-barrel quality to them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Barton posts all have a fish-in-a-barrel quality to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
