<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bryan Fischer: Freedom of religion only for Christians	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/03/23/bryan-fischer-freedom-of-religion-only-for-christians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/03/23/bryan-fischer-freedom-of-religion-only-for-christians/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Throbert McGee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/03/23/bryan-fischer-freedom-of-religion-only-for-christians/#comment-87959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Throbert McGee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8870#comment-87959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hazemyth, thanks for the link to Volokh Conspiracy, which specifically mentions Thomas Jefferson and the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Likewise, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the Virginia statute protecting religious freedom, which he drafted, deliberately covered &quot;the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination,&quot; and that &lt;strong&gt;a proposal to mention Christ in the bill &quot;was rejected by a great majority&lt;/strong&gt;, in proof that they meant to comprehend&quot; all religions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The VC post also notes that prior to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, various state constitutions had included language that protected any and all religious beliefs &lt;em&gt;so long as they acknowledged Christ&lt;/em&gt;, or any and all religious beliefs &lt;em&gt;so long as they acknowledged a Supreme Creator&lt;/em&gt;, etc. Thus, the framers of the Constitution had been very much aware of these alternative phrasings -- but rejected them -- when they chose the language used in the Constitution&#039;s &quot;no religious test&quot; clause and in the First Amendment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hazemyth, thanks for the link to Volokh Conspiracy, which specifically mentions Thomas Jefferson and the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom:</p>
<blockquote><p>Likewise, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the Virginia statute protecting religious freedom, which he drafted, deliberately covered &#8220;the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination,&#8221; and that <strong>a proposal to mention Christ in the bill &#8220;was rejected by a great majority</strong>, in proof that they meant to comprehend&#8221; all religions.</p></blockquote>
<p>The VC post also notes that prior to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, various state constitutions had included language that protected any and all religious beliefs <em>so long as they acknowledged Christ</em>, or any and all religious beliefs <em>so long as they acknowledged a Supreme Creator</em>, etc. Thus, the framers of the Constitution had been very much aware of these alternative phrasings &#8212; but rejected them &#8212; when they chose the language used in the Constitution&#8217;s &#8220;no religious test&#8221; clause and in the First Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hazemyth		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/03/23/bryan-fischer-freedom-of-religion-only-for-christians/#comment-87943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hazemyth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8870#comment-87943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was just reading this Volokh Conspiracy post, which offers further evidence of the framers&#039; ecumenical understanding of the freedom of religion:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/2011/03/25/islam-and-the-first-amendment/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Islam and the First Amendment&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reading this Volokh Conspiracy post, which offers further evidence of the framers&#8217; ecumenical understanding of the freedom of religion:<br />
<a href="http://volokh.com/2011/03/25/islam-and-the-first-amendment/" rel="nofollow">Islam and the First Amendment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Juan		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/03/23/bryan-fischer-freedom-of-religion-only-for-christians/#comment-87945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8870#comment-87945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suppose I have to mention that I am left of center. And atheist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I have to mention that I am left of center. And atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/03/23/bryan-fischer-freedom-of-religion-only-for-christians/#comment-87952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8870#comment-87952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ironically, the 1st Amend clause on religion is there to protect the people from the ideas espoused by brian fischer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, the 1st Amend clause on religion is there to protect the people from the ideas espoused by brian fischer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Blakeslee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/03/23/bryan-fischer-freedom-of-religion-only-for-christians/#comment-87955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Blakeslee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8870#comment-87955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This looks familiar:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Reading the relevant sections, it becomes clear that Fischer has pulled out a section out of the context of Story&#039;s eloquent tribute to freedom of conscience that is the First Amendment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Where have we seen this before...pulling out material from its proper context?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks familiar:</p>
<blockquote><p>Reading the relevant sections, it becomes clear that Fischer has pulled out a section out of the context of Story&#8217;s eloquent tribute to freedom of conscience that is the First Amendment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Where have we seen this before&#8230;pulling out material from its proper context?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
