<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bahati sidesteps questions about threats to BBC reporter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/02/13/bahati-sidesteps-questions-about-threats-to-bbc-reporter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/02/13/bahati-sidesteps-questions-about-threats-to-bbc-reporter/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/02/13/bahati-sidesteps-questions-about-threats-to-bbc-reporter/#comment-89229</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8628#comment-89229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In response to your first comment:-



No, darling &#8211; Mills didn&#039;t have the armed guard &#8211; it was your boy that called out the cavalry!



As for the UG High Commission&#039;s decision to grant a visa: well, ask them.



Rather embarrassing for you, I admit &#8211; you like to try to appear reasonable, but then up pops a loony and blows your cover.



Anyway &#8230; on the matter of &#039;being reasonable&#039;: how do YOU (in your habitual capacity as an anti-gay propagandist) justify punishing gay people for activities (such as consensual* sex outside of marriage) for which straight people are not to be punished? What jurisprudential principles do you cite for doing so?



In response to your second comment:-



I suspect that the Saudi authorities would not grant visas for people to go and film a documentary on this subject.  One must assume that the UG authorities did, for whatever reason, allow this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to your first comment:-</p>
<p>No, darling &#8211; Mills didn&#8217;t have the armed guard &#8211; it was your boy that called out the cavalry!</p>
<p>As for the UG High Commission&#8217;s decision to grant a visa: well, ask them.</p>
<p>Rather embarrassing for you, I admit &#8211; you like to try to appear reasonable, but then up pops a loony and blows your cover.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8230; on the matter of &#8216;being reasonable&#8217;: how do YOU (in your habitual capacity as an anti-gay propagandist) justify punishing gay people for activities (such as consensual* sex outside of marriage) for which straight people are not to be punished? What jurisprudential principles do you cite for doing so?</p>
<p>In response to your second comment:-</p>
<p>I suspect that the Saudi authorities would not grant visas for people to go and film a documentary on this subject.  One must assume that the UG authorities did, for whatever reason, allow this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/02/13/bahati-sidesteps-questions-about-threats-to-bbc-reporter/#comment-89230</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8628#comment-89230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder if Bahati&#039;s been told to &#039;shut up&#039; - hence his &#039;answer&#039; to your question?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Bahati&#8217;s been told to &#8216;shut up&#8217; &#8211; hence his &#8216;answer&#8217; to your question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hazemyth		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/02/13/bahati-sidesteps-questions-about-threats-to-bbc-reporter/#comment-86211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hazemyth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8628#comment-86211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the additional info and fact-checking, btw!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the additional info and fact-checking, btw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/02/13/bahati-sidesteps-questions-about-threats-to-bbc-reporter/#comment-46879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8628#comment-46879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You mean this article, don&#039;t you, &#039;Maazi&#039;?

http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/20/703994/homosexuality



I wouldn&#039;t call it exactly PRO-gay (more like &#039;anti-machete-waving-lunacy&#039;) ... but I can see that it might be rather too sensible for people like you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean this article, don&#8217;t you, &#8216;Maazi&#8217;?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/20/703994/homosexuality" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/20/703994/homosexuality</a></p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call it exactly PRO-gay (more like &#8216;anti-machete-waving-lunacy&#8217;) &#8230; but I can see that it might be rather too sensible for people like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Willmer		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2011/02/13/bahati-sidesteps-questions-about-threats-to-bbc-reporter/#comment-46878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Willmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wthrockmorton.com/?p=8628#comment-46878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t read the NV in those days!  But you have to admit, &#039;Maazi&#039;, it is unusual to have such &#039;tolerance&#039; (which I know you deplore!) should be mentioned two weeks running in the government organ.



I don&#039;t think your rudeness is a figment of anyone&#039;s imagination!





Anyway, sweetheart, you haven’t answered my earlier question, so here it is again:-



How do YOU (in your habitual capacity as an anti-gay propagandist) justify punishing gay people for activities (such as consensual sex outside of marriage) for which straight people are not to be punished? What jurisprudential principles do you cite for doing so?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t read the NV in those days!  But you have to admit, &#8216;Maazi&#8217;, it is unusual to have such &#8216;tolerance&#8217; (which I know you deplore!) should be mentioned two weeks running in the government organ.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think your rudeness is a figment of anyone&#8217;s imagination!</p>
<p>Anyway, sweetheart, you haven’t answered my earlier question, so here it is again:-</p>
<p>How do YOU (in your habitual capacity as an anti-gay propagandist) justify punishing gay people for activities (such as consensual sex outside of marriage) for which straight people are not to be punished? What jurisprudential principles do you cite for doing so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
