N. is reported to have said this:

“Kato wanted me to be his lover which I completely refused because I was not pleased with what he was doing to fellow men.”

Two things:-

1. it suggests that N. is not gay, and

2. it suggests that they did not have sex.

Bang goes the ‘lovers’ tiff’ theory?

Might there also be a whiff of ‘hatred’ here?

And what did N. want from Kato, I wonder?

http://sdgln.com/commentary/2011/02/05/commentary-video-rachel-maddow-examines-murder-david-kato

‘ Kayihura added that police were “not dismissing” the hate crime theory and cautioned the public and Uganda’s media against “intolerance.”

‘ Last year Kato was named and pictured by an anti-gay tabloid called Rolling Stone in a story that carried the headline “Hang Them” in reference to gay rights campaigners.

‘ “Whoever is talking about hanging, we are going to have to take them on. It is absolutely unacceptable,” Kayihura said.

‘ Kayihura also admonished Anglican priest Thomas Musoke for anti-gay remarks made at Kato’s funeral last week.

‘ “You don’t make such statements at a funeral,” he said. “God accepts everybody … you must be sensitive.”

‘ Although engaging in homosexual sex is listed in Uganda’s penal code, Kayihura said investigating such cases in not a top priority. ‘

This looks like sensible stuff to me.