Many of my UG friends just love the epithet ‘Bahitler’! ‘Bahatchet’ works OK, as does ‘Bahater’. How about ‘Bahammer’ (or is that a bit ‘close to the bone’, given recent events)?

Well, I’m very pleased that [BLEEP] has been granted a judicial review, and hope that [BLEEP]’s case is properly reviewed in the light of any evident deficiencies in prior procedures and the new ‘evidence’ concerning [BLEEP]’s sexuality supplied by David Bahati’s unsolicited ‘intervention’, and any other new evidence.

My very best wishes to [BLEEP] and those supporting [personal pronoun (accusative case) witheld for legal reasons].

But the campaign needs to be continued until she has leave to remain in the U.K..

Feel free to make your views known in no uncertain terms on the government of my country! I reject the idea of ‘my country – right or wrong!’

Am I supposed to be relied up by this tosh?

The above quote should have read:

Am I supposed to be riled up by this tosh? 😀

Brenda has now been released from detention:

http://lezgetreal.com/2011/02/brenda-namigadde-lesbian-asylum-seeker-released-out-of-uk-detention/

Good for her !!! I am not surprised. The Euro-American Gay Propagandist Lobby is a juggernaut in the West. Anyways, this sets a precedent for all those who wish to emigrate to Britain. Simply claim that you are sodomite in danger of being machine-gunned if sent home. Make sure to enlist the support of the pro-gay propagandists and presto !!—your asylum issues are over. No British judge—however brilliant and tough —-can afford to fight the “you-want-to-send-this-gay-asylum-seeker-to-a-certain-death” blackmail from these lobby groups. All an asylum seeker needs is to stand firm on his/her claims because insisting that you are gay in a consistent manner is usually sufficient since UK cannot violate “gay rights” by checking the backside of male claimants for evidence of sodomy or adopting Czech Republic methods for male and female claimants. 😀

How do you justify punishing gay people for activities (such as consensual* sex outside of marriage) for which straight people are not to be punished? What jurisprudential principles do you cite for doing so?

* Just to remind you that you have now accepted that there is such a thing as consensual same-sex activity – in fact, if not in law in UG.

You sound very excited, dear (your language is a little intemperate today*).

Your “observation” is merely a figment of your imagination.

But, of course, I’m delighted that you understand just how strong our human rights campaign is!

I acknowlegde that the pro-gay propagandist lobby is powerful in the West. Gayism has nothing to do with human rights.

I’ve noticed that most homophobic people like to indulge in graphic, often sexual, language, as well throwing around words like ‘deviant’, ‘criminal’ and ‘sodomite’ with monotonous regularity. But this is hardly surprising, given the confused and violent mindset of such people.

Am I supposed to be relied up by this tosh? 😀

http://sdgln.com/commentary/2011/01/31/commentary-british-judges-ruling-brenda-namigadde-ignorant-typical