‘Maazi’….can get a little overexcited sometimes – especially by homosexuality.

Maazi NCO is not excited in the slightest. He is not even that interested in gayism or any other form of sexual deviance. But Maazi has a vested interest and is working hard offline to ensure that no foreigner gets the right to veto the sovereign parliament of Uganda. Yes, our nation has problems which it has to deal with, but no foreigner has right to interfere and super-impose an anti-social behaviour rejected overwhelmingly by society and criminalized by the State.

Do you really care to know what the true motive of the crime might be, given the fact that several people in David Kato’s locality have been victims of a similar attack? Or are you more interested in seizing upon the tragic death for propaganda purposes? Do you live in Uganda or know what is going on there?

Maazi NCO,

I appreciate your posturing, however, I asked you two very important questions that you have chosed not to answer. Avoiding them adds more speculation. Please answer them and if you can, or want to, here are two more:

1) If it is determined and reported that David Kato was killed for his homosexuality, will your government and its’ supporters have fullfilled its’ objective?

2) Do you personally wish David Kato was still alive, homosexual and all, or are you satisified that he, beig a homosexual and all, is dead?

You can rest assured that there is no need for me to ‘call the FCO incessantly’.

I meant to say ‘fear AND anger’, of course.

All three of the ‘Rolling Stone’ plaintiffs have been threatened or harassed; one is now dead (something about which you have expressed no regret, despite the fact that this same person was deemed to have the right to life and dignity by your own High Court) . You are sitting behind your computer trying to score cheap points and split hairs. You know that you cannot justify your deep-seated longings for discriminatory penal legislation against gay people (you always side-step any questions on this point).

http://www.monitor.co.ug/OpEd/Editorial/-/689360/1097060/-/91oahk/-/index.html

@ so-called ‘Maazi’ : The ‘gay-on-gay’ theory seem to have been forgotten now (see new post on this blog) … suggesting that I, and the BBC, were probably correct to doubt it. So there we are. And talking of Ugandan law: Kato was deemed to be ‘on the right side’ of it by the High Court of your country earlier this month. Now he’s been murdered.

You are entitled to your views, even though you lot are deeply intolerant of opinions that fails to pander to your libertarian, western-centric worldview. The police is investigating the homicide and those who carried out the murder will be brought to justice.

David Blakeslee,

If Warren Throckmorton is able to communicate with people inside Uganda so can you. Contact the police there and ask questions. If you want to sit down in an armchair thousands of miles away and conjure your own motives for the murder then that’s your own business. If you decide like Richard Willmer that you can never be persuaded by the [preliminary] evidence, then please carry on like him. But please note that the Ugandan State will continue to maintain its sovereign right to make laws without foreign veto.

The motive for the man’s death may have been burgulary. There is sufficient evidence for the police to think this way given the fact that: (a) the victim’s clothes were stolen and (b) money was removed from his house.

Please pass along supportive articles or documents to put this in the perspective you say it should be put in.

Kato won at your High Court, remember? Now he’s dead.