*yayness*

As for attitudes to their gay compatriots, I have seen people change their minds. I know this idea causes you discomfort, but I’m convinced that this is happening. (Only today, I lunched with a Ugandan lawyer, and we agreed strongly on this very point. You are, of course, at liberty to disagree with both of us …)

Of course, there are Ugandans who agree with gay sex or subscribe to libertarian ideology. Those who subscribe to that ideology are the ones who most likely to accept arguments offered by gay sex practitioners about morality, culture and traditions not having any part in framing the laws of a country. The question you should be asking is how many lawyers in Uganda agree with your Ugandan lawyer friend’s opinion? BTW, I am not suffering from any discomfort—-whatever gave you that idea !

Most (maybe all) of the Ugandans with whom I communicate are not ‘gay sex practitioners’, as far as I know, so if that’s what you’re really looking for, I can’t help you.

Maazi, I’m amazed that you would repeat your Botswana 2003 2004 2006 line after it was taken care of by James Onen… it’s a worthless line. You can let it go now.

James Onen, did not address it because it seems he doesn’t know much about it. He asked me to provide him with copies of the 3 verdicts, which I have declined to do since he can request the copies from his foreign gay sex buddies. The Botswana case is quite important because the line of reasoning employed by the judges in the Southern African nation can be relied upon by our own judges in Uganda in case any potential court challenge against the Penal Code Act and its amended descendants.