‘Maazi’

Are YOU perhaps involved in pushing the Bill forward? Or just a ‘cheerleader’ (in a brown shirt, perhaps)?

Brown Shirt? I am not a follower of il duche and this is not 1920s Europe. But lets wait for Doc Throckmorton to act on the other thread. Okay?

You’re an intelligent guy; I’m sure you understand the distinction I’ve cited (i.e. that between ‘openness’ and ‘advocacy’), and the complex jurisprudential issues around the concept of ‘promoting something’.

(Note the [temporary] removal of the inverted commas – let’s call it ‘Christmas truce’!)

Can’t seem to do smilies – sorry!

P.S. I was interested by your remark that someone would not be criminalise because they said they were gay, but only if they ‘advocated for a gay lifestyle’ (OWTTE). Are you certain that this very important distinction (‘honesty’ as opposed to ‘advocacy’) would be respected under law if a ‘revised’ BB were to be enacted?

OK. Speak later.

I’ll be very busy over the next few days, so – in case we don’t communicate before – have a good Christmas.

Richard, in spite of our deep disagreements, I do have some respect for you. I wish you and those close to you a merry xmas and happy new year !!! 😀

I currently cannot post at the moment at the thread containing the blog article on UN gay resolution. I think it is best to allow Dr. Throckmorton sort out the moderation issues over there before we continue since that thread is much better for the flow of conversation.