<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Michael Brown responds to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach: Are evangelicals obsessed with homosexuality?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/11/05/michael-brown-responds-to-rabbi-shumley-boteach-are-evangelicals-obsessed-with-homosexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/11/05/michael-brown-responds-to-rabbi-shumley-boteach-are-evangelicals-obsessed-with-homosexuality/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:35:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/11/05/michael-brown-responds-to-rabbi-shumley-boteach-are-evangelicals-obsessed-with-homosexuality/#comment-83615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=7847#comment-83615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow - I just watched the video and I have to say the Rabbi was wonderful.  He laid the blame, the ENTIRE blame for marriage as an institution failing at the feet of heterosexuals.  His voice was loud and passionate, but his arguments were wonderfully convincing!  Its hard not to see how Evangelical Christians are not obsessed with homosexuality - not to mention all the reasons Warren pointed to above that point to the same conclusion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I just watched the video and I have to say the Rabbi was wonderful.  He laid the blame, the ENTIRE blame for marriage as an institution failing at the feet of heterosexuals.  His voice was loud and passionate, but his arguments were wonderfully convincing!  Its hard not to see how Evangelical Christians are not obsessed with homosexuality &#8211; not to mention all the reasons Warren pointed to above that point to the same conclusion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Timothy Kincaid		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/11/05/michael-brown-responds-to-rabbi-shumley-boteach-are-evangelicals-obsessed-with-homosexuality/#comment-83620</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Kincaid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=7847#comment-83620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zoe



&lt;blockquote&gt;They pick and choose which parts of scripture to adhere to, and which to discard,...&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Yes, or at least which parts to prioritize and which to minimize.  We all do it.  As, indeed we should.



Christians do not worship the Bible - or at least should not worship the Bible (many do) - but rather worship God.  The Bible is a tool to get to know God.  And like all tools, it can be applied usefully or it can destroy.



I think the important thing is to distinguish between those who know that they use the Bible as a guide and an instruction (but not a textbook or rulebook) and those who have convinced themselves that they are &quot;Bible believing Christians&quot; while they jump in circles trying to be consistent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoe</p>
<blockquote><p>They pick and choose which parts of scripture to adhere to, and which to discard,&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, or at least which parts to prioritize and which to minimize.  We all do it.  As, indeed we should.</p>
<p>Christians do not worship the Bible &#8211; or at least should not worship the Bible (many do) &#8211; but rather worship God.  The Bible is a tool to get to know God.  And like all tools, it can be applied usefully or it can destroy.</p>
<p>I think the important thing is to distinguish between those who know that they use the Bible as a guide and an instruction (but not a textbook or rulebook) and those who have convinced themselves that they are &#8220;Bible believing Christians&#8221; while they jump in circles trying to be consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zoe Brain		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/11/05/michael-brown-responds-to-rabbi-shumley-boteach-are-evangelicals-obsessed-with-homosexuality/#comment-83613</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoe Brain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=7847#comment-83613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to view the debate first.



Sorry, I think that&#039;s not optional, if I&#039;m going to comment, it&#039;s mandatory. Not only that, but I will try not to be prejudiced by Warren&#039;s article. I may fail of course, but I have to try my hardest, or betray my own principles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to view the debate first.</p>
<p>Sorry, I think that&#8217;s not optional, if I&#8217;m going to comment, it&#8217;s mandatory. Not only that, but I will try not to be prejudiced by Warren&#8217;s article. I may fail of course, but I have to try my hardest, or betray my own principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zoe Brain		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/11/05/michael-brown-responds-to-rabbi-shumley-boteach-are-evangelicals-obsessed-with-homosexuality/#comment-83614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoe Brain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=7847#comment-83614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I also think it&#039;s worth watching, and that without watching it, going to the primary source, one&#039;s comments have to have far less value.



Look at what was said, not what I or anyone else said was said.



I do wish a written transcript was available though, so I could easily quote from it.



I think that&#039;s what is needed is to stop talking past each other. Dr B makes some points that need addressing. We should address them.



He also ignores all the points we make though. I can&#039;t blame him if we do the same. What is most vexing is that, while making good points about freedom of religion, he completely ignores the continuing political persecution by evangelical &quot;christians&quot; (scare quotes intended) that outweighs it by 1000:1. He strains at a gnat (a very real gnat that should be dealt with) while swallowing vast herds of camels. In order to get him to see those camels, we need to deal with the gnat first. Then, hopefully, he&#039;ll &quot;get it&quot;. That what he&#039;s doing out of blindness is completely against his own principles. 



At the same time, we must keep open minds ourselves. What if it is we who are wrong? We should not make it an &quot;us vs them&quot; deal. If I&#039;m so very correct, then the mountains, the whole continents of evidence will show that. Perhaps by showing such open-mindedness ourselves, we&#039;ll get others to do the same. We&#039;re bound to learn something, anyway.



Ok, I&#039;m tilting at windmills. But I wouldn&#039;t try this on some - Peter LaBarbera for example, or George Rekers. 



And it is only 2 hours not 3.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think it&#8217;s worth watching, and that without watching it, going to the primary source, one&#8217;s comments have to have far less value.</p>
<p>Look at what was said, not what I or anyone else said was said.</p>
<p>I do wish a written transcript was available though, so I could easily quote from it.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s what is needed is to stop talking past each other. Dr B makes some points that need addressing. We should address them.</p>
<p>He also ignores all the points we make though. I can&#8217;t blame him if we do the same. What is most vexing is that, while making good points about freedom of religion, he completely ignores the continuing political persecution by evangelical &#8220;christians&#8221; (scare quotes intended) that outweighs it by 1000:1. He strains at a gnat (a very real gnat that should be dealt with) while swallowing vast herds of camels. In order to get him to see those camels, we need to deal with the gnat first. Then, hopefully, he&#8217;ll &#8220;get it&#8221;. That what he&#8217;s doing out of blindness is completely against his own principles. </p>
<p>At the same time, we must keep open minds ourselves. What if it is we who are wrong? We should not make it an &#8220;us vs them&#8221; deal. If I&#8217;m so very correct, then the mountains, the whole continents of evidence will show that. Perhaps by showing such open-mindedness ourselves, we&#8217;ll get others to do the same. We&#8217;re bound to learn something, anyway.</p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m tilting at windmills. But I wouldn&#8217;t try this on some &#8211; Peter LaBarbera for example, or George Rekers. </p>
<p>And it is only 2 hours not 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Roberts		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/11/05/michael-brown-responds-to-rabbi-shumley-boteach-are-evangelicals-obsessed-with-homosexuality/#comment-83610</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=7847#comment-83610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Truly a waste of time and space, both here and in the Post.  Brown is a master of doublespeak and obfuscation, which renders his debates unproductive and curiously boring.  I guess I can sort of understand your desire to be &quot;fair&quot; by linking to his requisite rebuttal, especially since he would bug you to death via email if you didn&#039;t.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly a waste of time and space, both here and in the Post.  Brown is a master of doublespeak and obfuscation, which renders his debates unproductive and curiously boring.  I guess I can sort of understand your desire to be &#8220;fair&#8221; by linking to his requisite rebuttal, especially since he would bug you to death via email if you didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
