<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Uganda&#8217;s Rolling Stone brings out second part of Hang Them campaign; court to hear objections	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/10/31/ugandas-rolling-stone-brings-out-second-part-of-hang-them-campaign-court-to-hear-objections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/10/31/ugandas-rolling-stone-brings-out-second-part-of-hang-them-campaign-court-to-hear-objections/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn David		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/10/31/ugandas-rolling-stone-brings-out-second-part-of-hang-them-campaign-court-to-hear-objections/#comment-79497</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=7798#comment-79497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just ran across and article concerning a Catholic understanding of the Bible by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Catholic Bishops of Britian&lt;/a&gt; which had been prepared in 2005.   The article says in part:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect &quot;total accuracy&quot; from the Bible.  &lt;strong&gt; &quot;We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,&quot; they say in The Gift of Scripture&lt;/strong&gt;.... 

.

The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible. 

.

In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is &quot;God&#039;s word expressed in human language&quot; and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions. 

.

They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways &quot;appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries.&quot;   The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: &quot;We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.&quot;   

.

&lt;strong&gt;They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its &quot;intransigent intolerance&quot; and to warn of &quot;significant dangers&quot; involved in a fundamentalist approach.     &quot;Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.&quot; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across and article concerning a Catholic understanding of the Bible by <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece" rel="nofollow">Catholic Bishops of Britian</a> which had been prepared in 2005.   The article says in part:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect &#8220;total accuracy&#8221; from the Bible.  <strong> &#8220;We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,&#8221; they say in The Gift of Scripture</strong>&#8230;. </p>
<p>.</p>
<p>The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible. </p>
<p>.</p>
<p>In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is &#8220;God&#8217;s word expressed in human language&#8221; and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions. </p>
<p>.</p>
<p>They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways &#8220;appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries.&#8221;   The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: &#8220;We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.&#8221;   </p>
<p>.</p>
<p><strong>They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its &#8220;intransigent intolerance&#8221; and to warn of &#8220;significant dangers&#8221; involved in a fundamentalist approach.     &#8220;Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.&#8221; </strong> </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn David		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/10/31/ugandas-rolling-stone-brings-out-second-part-of-hang-them-campaign-court-to-hear-objections/#comment-43934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=7798#comment-43934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just ran across and article concerning a Catholic understanding of the Bible by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Catholic Bishops of Britian&lt;/a&gt; which had been prepared in 2005.   The article says in part:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect “total accuracy” from the Bible.  &lt;strong&gt; “We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,” they say in The Gift of Scripture&lt;/strong&gt;.... 

.

The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible. 

.

In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is “God’s word expressed in human language” and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions. 

.

They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways “appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries.”   The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: “We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.”   

.

&lt;strong&gt;They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its “intransigent intolerance” and to warn of “significant dangers” involved in a fundamentalist approach.     “Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.” &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across and article concerning a Catholic understanding of the Bible by <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece" rel="nofollow">Catholic Bishops of Britian</a> which had been prepared in 2005.   The article says in part:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect “total accuracy” from the Bible.  <strong> “We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,” they say in The Gift of Scripture</strong>&#8230;. </p>
<p>.</p>
<p>The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible. </p>
<p>.</p>
<p>In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is “God’s word expressed in human language” and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions. </p>
<p>.</p>
<p>They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways “appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries.”   The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: “We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.”   </p>
<p>.</p>
<p><strong>They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its “intransigent intolerance” and to warn of “significant dangers” involved in a fundamentalist approach.     “Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.” </strong> </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
