Maazi writes in the same terms our own racist Southern politicians ( and not just southern) used to use when discussing black Americans

yeah that sound to me pretty similar to George Wallace’s “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever”

Timothy and Stephen,

Africans are not deceived by your attempts to portray the historic struggle of non-whites and Jewish people to be treated with human dignity as equivalent to the struggle by powerful Western gay lobbies to forcefully globalize their deviant sexual culture by using their Western government proxies to wield the donor aid as a weapon of blackmail on poorer countries. We will never recognize a deviant sexual culture which could shoot up the HIV/AIDS rates as a human right—- get it ??!!

Why not accuse the health authorities in Europe and America that ban sex deviants from donating their extremely risky blood to hospitals of being George Wallaces or even Strom Thurmonds? You can say whatever you want, but we know that race is not equivalent to deviant sexualities—be it bestiality, be it necrophilia, be it gayism. Your propaganda that “gay rights is civil rights” may win you gullible liberal converts in the West, but we are far more sensible to fall for such nonsense. The preservation of our solidarity-based communal society is of paramount importance to us and any foreigner who doesn’t have to live in our continent has absolutely no right to impose his/her lifestyle on us.

Things like liberty and other unalienable rights being bestowed by the Creator and not by man.

You never noticed how vague those are? If everyone wanted to and agreed to it they could have voted the bible as the constitution. And they chose not to. There were many things about which they disagreed. Hence, the vague language.

That’s when nobody had to define “morality” or “common interest.”

Sorry but that’s a fantasy history. The founding fathers argued and fought over what should be included in the constitution as well as the declaration of independence. It was not an easy “convention”

Doesn’t it take an ulterior motive to believe that? A desire to force something to be self-evident or God-created that isn’t?

Can you expand your thought on this. I’m not sure I’m understanding you exactly.