Would ‘marriage equality’ impact them towards zero tolerance or would it work the other way.

I wish I could recall where I saw it, but a year or so ago I read an article by a gay guy discussing how marriage impacted his life. He said that it surprised him in the way in which it impacted his views on monogamy.

Prior to marriage he and his guy were mostly monogamous but (if I recall correctly) occasionally one or both would have outside sex. But after making vows he and his husband found themselves newly jealous. They didn’t want anyone else touching their man and decided that marriage meant no outside play.

I don’t know if this is usual, common, or an exception, but I’m not surprised that the expectations and commitments and responsibilities of marriage change a person. We’ve seen it forever in straights, so I would not be surprised to see it in gays as well.

Debbie did not say that they had never seen or heard of it but simply that there was on word for it. So she wasn’t saying that it was an ‘unknown concept’ as you suggest but rather that it was one that there wasn’t a quick ‘buzzword’ for. And this is quite understandable.

There were plenty of words in Greek which discuss same-sex behavior and same-sex love. Remember we’re talking about what the Victorians referred to as “the vice of the Greeks”.

I have no idea why Paul did not use the common current language if he wished to condemn either same-sex behavior or same-sex love, but it wasn’t due to any lack of words.

Isn’t this the start of graciousness to one another? Each person’s spiritual journey, and relationship with Our Lord, is uniquely just that … each person’s.

Exactly, Teresa. 🙂

Yes, Teresa uses the terms interchangeably. I should have been clearer in noting that I wasn’t necessarily speaking of Teresa’s usage.

I was just trying to inform you of the usage that my community has.

But now that he has revealed his 10-year same-sex relationship, I think there is a valid case for his decision to be vacated.

No, I don’t think that is a valid case.

That one might be impacted by a case – as a class of people – is not cause for invalidation. Or we should call for the recusal of all of the justices that are heterosexually married, lest they seek to protect their marriage from the harm of same-sex marriage.

And we’ll leave the decision to the two heterosexual single women on the court, Kagen and Sotomayor? Would you support that? 😉

It certainly fits the trend of increasing support for gay marriage over the years.

I’m not much interested in your continued untruthful accusations, accompanied by bizarre, paranoid insinuations, and implied blame about totally unrelated people.

If you want to apologize for the slurs and the attacks, I’ll listen. If you pledge to stop the campaign of personal villification, I’m all ears.

Timothy

It’s almost as if they treat ‘marriage’ and ‘family’ as synonymous.

I think in many respects they are. “Found a family” and “reproduce” are not.