I would think that not knowing LaBarbera or Higgins personally would suggest that their ‘portrayal or critique’ was not personally motivated…and, it seems that they’ve expressed their own conflict pretty clearly.

It seems that supporting the individual’s choice, even if it includes embracing and integrating homosexuality, is central to SIT –and LaBarbera and Higgins are expressing concerns about the embracing and integrating. While I do believe that, as a courtesy, they should have addressed this with you personally or via the link, their concerns revolve around the issue of ‘sin’ and ‘eternal consequence’. Experience has clearly demonstrated that actual discussion of those issues or concerns fails miserably in any open forum.

I concur with Warren’s opening statement. Even their critique has–and will–serve you well. It did manage to be somewhat objective…people can read it, hear what they object to, and then decide for themselves if SIT is a viable alternative for them.

Methinks somebody needs to get a life, and/or begin telling the truth, and I don’t want to name any names, but his name could rhyme with “Schmeter Schnagarbara”.