<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Teen Mania Ministries issues statement about Uganda&#8217;s Anti-Homosexuality Bill	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/01/08/teenmaniauganda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/01/08/teenmaniauganda/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/01/08/teenmaniauganda/#comment-36619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5803#comment-36619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Teen Mania Ministries will also be re-evaluating all Ugandan and African partners to ensure that we are not partnering with or supporting anyone who has advocated for a blanket death penalty for homosexual offenders.&quot;



Can someone tell me what this means?  What does TMM mean when they say they won&#039;t support a &quot;blanket death penalty&quot; for homosexual offenders?  On the surface it sounds great, but all of these responses from evangelical groups seem to be coming with various conditions attached to them.  Perhaps I am reading them incorrectly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Teen Mania Ministries will also be re-evaluating all Ugandan and African partners to ensure that we are not partnering with or supporting anyone who has advocated for a blanket death penalty for homosexual offenders.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can someone tell me what this means?  What does TMM mean when they say they won&#8217;t support a &#8220;blanket death penalty&#8221; for homosexual offenders?  On the surface it sounds great, but all of these responses from evangelical groups seem to be coming with various conditions attached to them.  Perhaps I am reading them incorrectly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gayuganda		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/01/08/teenmaniauganda/#comment-36618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gayuganda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5803#comment-36618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good that they at least did check Ssempa out.



gug]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good that they at least did check Ssempa out.</p>
<p>gug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/01/08/teenmaniauganda/#comment-36617</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5803#comment-36617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Those are &quot;sins&quot; dictated by Pope Gregory(I think).   However your point is well taken, if Uganda wants a completely biblically based society why not sentence all to death (as we were before the sacrifice of Christ)  They probably do not believe in Chrisa&#039;s sacrifice.  I&#039;m still trying to figure out the meaning of punishing with varying degree the sinsof others.  And killing people who have a chance to &quot;repent&quot; if left to live.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony</p></blockquote>
<p>Those are &#8220;sins&#8221; dictated by Pope Gregory(I think).   However your point is well taken, if Uganda wants a completely biblically based society why not sentence all to death (as we were before the sacrifice of Christ)  They probably do not believe in Chrisa&#8217;s sacrifice.  I&#8217;m still trying to figure out the meaning of punishing with varying degree the sinsof others.  And killing people who have a chance to &#8220;repent&#8221; if left to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/01/08/teenmaniauganda/#comment-36616</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5803#comment-36616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Teen Mania will continue to hold fast to the biblical teachings found in Lev. 18:22&quot;



Hey, I thought all the Biblical experts and self-described Christians on this site were emphatic that Levitical laws no longer apply today (well, the embarrassing ones anyway).  Yet here is an open affirmation of Leviticus 18:22, no different from the position of most evangelical churches in the US.  Apparently someone forgot to tell a large chunk of American Christendom that the bloodiest statutes of the OT are no longer in force.



What is interesting is that Teen Mania fails to affirm Leviticus 20:13, which only a few hundred words down from 18:22, which is substantively identical to 18:22, but which contains an additional sentence expressly requiring that homosexuals be put to death.  Teen Mania could hardly mention 20:13 with a straight face in a press release denouncing a law that would impose the very punishment required by 20:13.  



When you say that the first sentence of 20:13 is &quot;biblical teaching&quot; but the second sentence is not, that is not coherent theology.  That is called cherry-picking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Teen Mania will continue to hold fast to the biblical teachings found in Lev. 18:22&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, I thought all the Biblical experts and self-described Christians on this site were emphatic that Levitical laws no longer apply today (well, the embarrassing ones anyway).  Yet here is an open affirmation of Leviticus 18:22, no different from the position of most evangelical churches in the US.  Apparently someone forgot to tell a large chunk of American Christendom that the bloodiest statutes of the OT are no longer in force.</p>
<p>What is interesting is that Teen Mania fails to affirm Leviticus 20:13, which only a few hundred words down from 18:22, which is substantively identical to 18:22, but which contains an additional sentence expressly requiring that homosexuals be put to death.  Teen Mania could hardly mention 20:13 with a straight face in a press release denouncing a law that would impose the very punishment required by 20:13.  </p>
<p>When you say that the first sentence of 20:13 is &#8220;biblical teaching&#8221; but the second sentence is not, that is not coherent theology.  That is called cherry-picking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Norris Hall		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2010/01/08/teenmaniauganda/#comment-36615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norris Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5803#comment-36615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If Uganda really want to follow Biblical teachings why not impose death penalty for wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony.   

That should just about wipe out everyone in Uganda.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Uganda really want to follow Biblical teachings why not impose death penalty for wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony.   </p>
<p>That should just about wipe out everyone in Uganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
