<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rick Warren issues statement to Uganda regarding Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/12/10/rick-warren-issues-statement-to-uganda-regarding-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/12/10/rick-warren-issues-statement-to-uganda-regarding-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:49:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eddy		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/12/10/rick-warren-issues-statement-to-uganda-regarding-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009/#comment-36085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5526#comment-36085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Duffy--

This is an ongoing site...been around for years with (usually) ever changing topics (although we&#039;ve been on non-stop Uganda for a month or so.) Anyway, we&#039;ve discussed gay marriage before and I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll discuss it again. It does happen to be way off this topic and your tone suggests that you won&#039;t be particularly open to opinions that differ from yours...so perhaps it would be best saved for another day. 

Ah, but if not, by using the seach button up near the right top of the page, you could likely tap into some past discussion on &#039;gay marriage&#039;. Most of the threads remain open regardless of how old they are. If you find one where the conversation intrigues you, feel free to comment there. Most people who were heavily involved in the conversation likely &#039;subscribed&#039; to it, so they&#039;d be notified that a new comment has come in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duffy&#8211;</p>
<p>This is an ongoing site&#8230;been around for years with (usually) ever changing topics (although we&#8217;ve been on non-stop Uganda for a month or so.) Anyway, we&#8217;ve discussed gay marriage before and I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll discuss it again. It does happen to be way off this topic and your tone suggests that you won&#8217;t be particularly open to opinions that differ from yours&#8230;so perhaps it would be best saved for another day. </p>
<p>Ah, but if not, by using the seach button up near the right top of the page, you could likely tap into some past discussion on &#8216;gay marriage&#8217;. Most of the threads remain open regardless of how old they are. If you find one where the conversation intrigues you, feel free to comment there. Most people who were heavily involved in the conversation likely &#8216;subscribed&#8217; to it, so they&#8217;d be notified that a new comment has come in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Duffy Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/12/10/rick-warren-issues-statement-to-uganda-regarding-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009/#comment-36084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duffy Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5526#comment-36084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I commend Pastor Warren for speaking out on this important issue, but I must take exception with his stand on gay marriage. It most certainly IS a civil right...how could it not be?? Will someone please explain to me how it is possibly ok to deny gays the right to legally marry, and then NOTcall it intolerant and discriminatory???]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I commend Pastor Warren for speaking out on this important issue, but I must take exception with his stand on gay marriage. It most certainly IS a civil right&#8230;how could it not be?? Will someone please explain to me how it is possibly ok to deny gays the right to legally marry, and then NOTcall it intolerant and discriminatory???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eddy		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/12/10/rick-warren-issues-statement-to-uganda-regarding-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009/#comment-36083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5526#comment-36083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[David--

That point wasn&#039;t lost on me! :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8211;</p>
<p>That point wasn&#8217;t lost on me! 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Blakeslee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/12/10/rick-warren-issues-statement-to-uganda-regarding-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009/#comment-36082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Blakeslee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5526#comment-36082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My point here is that sexual morality has long been codified in civil law.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point here is that sexual morality has long been codified in civil law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Blakeslee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/12/10/rick-warren-issues-statement-to-uganda-regarding-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009/#comment-36081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Blakeslee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5526#comment-36081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So Heterosexuals have punished themselves for sexual sins too!



&lt;blockquote&gt;The law is actually 200 years old (and adultery is a lot older than that) and it originally punished convicted adulterers with an hour standing on the gallows with a noose around the neck (that&#039;d kill most lustful thoughts, I&#039;d imagine), or 39 lashes or a year in jail or a fine of 100 pounds, which was probably a lot more then than it sounds now. Modernity being what it is, the penalty has been reduced to a $1,200 fine -- and no time on the gallows -- and it now may go by the boards entirely.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Found here:  http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/12/14/new-hampshire-to-legalize-adultery-gay-marriage-is-a-slippery-s/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Heterosexuals have punished themselves for sexual sins too!</p>
<blockquote><p>The law is actually 200 years old (and adultery is a lot older than that) and it originally punished convicted adulterers with an hour standing on the gallows with a noose around the neck (that&#8217;d kill most lustful thoughts, I&#8217;d imagine), or 39 lashes or a year in jail or a fine of 100 pounds, which was probably a lot more then than it sounds now. Modernity being what it is, the penalty has been reduced to a $1,200 fine &#8212; and no time on the gallows &#8212; and it now may go by the boards entirely.</p></blockquote>
<p>Found here:  <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/12/14/new-hampshire-to-legalize-adultery-gay-marriage-is-a-slippery-s/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/12/14/new-hampshire-to-legalize-adultery-gay-marriage-is-a-slippery-s/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
