<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FOX News covers PFOX effort to get ex-gay books in school libraries	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/10/22/fox-news-covers-pfox-effort-to-get-ex-gay-books-in-school-libraries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/10/22/fox-news-covers-pfox-effort-to-get-ex-gay-books-in-school-libraries/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:44:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayhuck		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/10/22/fox-news-covers-pfox-effort-to-get-ex-gay-books-in-school-libraries/#comment-34271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5220#comment-34271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With such terrible and faulty arguments against gay marriage and nearly slanderous statements made about gay people in general, I&#039;m not sure where to put these books - definitely not in a category that would come close to legitimizing such drivel - maybe we could create a new category - I have ideas for names :)  I have a feeling that putting such books in libraries would only help the gay cause so I say go for it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With such terrible and faulty arguments against gay marriage and nearly slanderous statements made about gay people in general, I&#8217;m not sure where to put these books &#8211; definitely not in a category that would come close to legitimizing such drivel &#8211; maybe we could create a new category &#8211; I have ideas for names 🙂  I have a feeling that putting such books in libraries would only help the gay cause so I say go for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrick Fitzgerald (Emproph)		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2009/10/22/fox-news-covers-pfox-effort-to-get-ex-gay-books-in-school-libraries/#comment-34270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Fitzgerald (Emproph)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=5220#comment-34270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;“I think the books should be included in the libraries”&lt;/I&gt;



&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;I&gt;Marriage on Trial&lt;/I&gt; by Glenn Stanton and Bill Maier



&lt;b&gt;Question 1&lt;/b&gt;. Wouldn’t accepting gay marriage help us all get along better?



&lt;strong&gt;Answer&lt;/strong&gt;. Actually, quite the opposite. It would alienate two key groups of people: (1) “married” gays from gays who don’t want marriage  (2) couples like Greg and Christopher from much of heterosexual community. [p60]&lt;/blockquote&gt;How sweet of Stanton and Maier to be concerned about the unity of the gay community.



Not to mention that TWICE, on P’s 43 and 65, they use---criminaly---the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,003.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dutch Study&lt;/a&gt; to show that gay men shouldn‘t be allowed to marry because we’re are all to slutty.

--

Jeff Konrad’s book “You don’t have to be gay,”:



“It’s appallingly common in the gay community to have literally hundreds of sexual partners over a lifetime. [P114]”



That, coming from a study that has long since been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,009/000,002.htm#RefW&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;refuted&lt;/a&gt; by BoxTurtleBulletin.



&lt;I&gt;“I think the books should be included in the libraries”&lt;/I&gt;



I think so too. But as a warning, and labeled as such.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“I think the books should be included in the libraries”</i></p>
<blockquote><p><i>Marriage on Trial</i> by Glenn Stanton and Bill Maier</p>
<p><b>Question 1</b>. Wouldn’t accepting gay marriage help us all get along better?</p>
<p><strong>Answer</strong>. Actually, quite the opposite. It would alienate two key groups of people: (1) “married” gays from gays who don’t want marriage  (2) couples like Greg and Christopher from much of heterosexual community. [p60]</p></blockquote>
<p>How sweet of Stanton and Maier to be concerned about the unity of the gay community.</p>
<p>Not to mention that TWICE, on P’s 43 and 65, they use&#8212;criminaly&#8212;the <a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,003.htm" rel="nofollow">Dutch Study</a> to show that gay men shouldn‘t be allowed to marry because we’re are all to slutty.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Jeff Konrad’s book “You don’t have to be gay,”:</p>
<p>“It’s appallingly common in the gay community to have literally hundreds of sexual partners over a lifetime. [P114]”</p>
<p>That, coming from a study that has long since been <a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,009/000,002.htm#RefW" rel="nofollow">refuted</a> by BoxTurtleBulletin.</p>
<p><i>“I think the books should be included in the libraries”</i></p>
<p>I think so too. But as a warning, and labeled as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
