If that leads you to think that evolutionary biologists find the existence of same-sex attraction to be contrary to natural selection, you go for it. I’ve wearied of arguing this with you.

?????????? I simply supplied links because we WERE talking about the subject recently. It was a gesture of, gulp, friendship–you know, like people sharing something because they had been talking about it? Like all the studies before it, no one claims to KNOW the answer. I don’t have a reason to want you to change your opinion; however, way back, you challenged how I could entertain an explanation that wasn’t w/in the framework of your view, so I have explained how/why —because scientists of all stripes are confused and are willing to look at where they have been again but also willing to look elsewher . Thus, their studies have influenced my view.

When I saw this, I thought it was something that a person like you, who obviously reads about the subject, would want to read, period. I didn’t expect a response, just offered the links with no “argument” sought. I can see that this subject will always lead to what is in your mind an argument rather than an exchange of ideas culled from readings so….an end of discussion is appropriate, it seems.

Yes. Linked to an article about two evolutionary biologists who disagree with you is a reference to an earlier biologist who neither agrees nor disagrees with you but cannot at present verify one hypothesis.

If that leads you to think that evolutionary biologists find the existence of same-sex attraction to be contrary to natural selection, you go for it. I’ve wearied of arguing this with you.

I WILL find that thread…turns out I was subscribed to three not two. And just tonight I was musing about the prospect of not subscribing at all. I do believe that the search process would take much less time than the delete process in my inbox. Especially when you get the “oh and just one more thing’ rejoinder comments where one bloggers lands in your inbox 3 or 4 times in less than a half hour.

My only real problem now is to repost this comment where it belongs without the dreaded ‘You’ve already said that’ prompt. Well, here’s tryin’.

Let’s not overlook the obvious. Please consult the banner at the top of the page. First you will see the name of our host: Warren Throckmorton. Next you will see a byline describing the topics our host is most interested in. I’m not saying that Warren is not interested in or concerned about genocide…but it’s a HUGE world wide web. This is HIS website. He’s a Christian Psychologist and has even launched a program of Sexual Identity Therapy. While genocide is a worthy topic and surely has consequences and ramifications (at least while on earth) that far exceed homosexuality, do his ‘issues of concern’ really have to be put on hold until genocide is resolved? Or can we trust that genocide will be discussed and perhaps addressed on one or more of the gazillion other websites? (You’ve been around awhile. I meant no disrespect although I know my comment may have come across direct and curt. However, sometimes, the more direct route communicates most effectively. I wasn’t putting you down or putting you off…simply explaining why we do what we do here.)