<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Auto bailout fails in Senate	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/12/11/auto-bailout-fails-in-senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/12/11/auto-bailout-fails-in-senate/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Legolas		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/12/11/auto-bailout-fails-in-senate/#comment-24331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legolas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=2671#comment-24331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, this version of the events is false by omission; it tells a little less than half of the story.  The UAW already has already proactively made wage concessions.  A year-old contract is already in place to move new hire wages into line with the non-union foreign company plants and shift the burden of retiree costs, among other things.  The UAW also agreed to broader wage concessions in these negotiations, just on a different timeline than the Republicans preferred, and from their point of view the main problem was that worker and retiree cost concessions were being asked for out of context - other stakeholders were not being asked to pony up.  If the UAW was the sticking point because the Republicans really didn&#039;t ask anyone else for concessions, it&#039;s not exactly fair to say they were the roadblock.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this version of the events is false by omission; it tells a little less than half of the story.  The UAW already has already proactively made wage concessions.  A year-old contract is already in place to move new hire wages into line with the non-union foreign company plants and shift the burden of retiree costs, among other things.  The UAW also agreed to broader wage concessions in these negotiations, just on a different timeline than the Republicans preferred, and from their point of view the main problem was that worker and retiree cost concessions were being asked for out of context &#8211; other stakeholders were not being asked to pony up.  If the UAW was the sticking point because the Republicans really didn&#8217;t ask anyone else for concessions, it&#8217;s not exactly fair to say they were the roadblock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
